切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 363 -365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.04.010

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

Lichtenstein和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟阴囊疝患者中的临床应用
荀江1,()   
  1. 1. 211300 南京市高淳人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-28 出版日期:2020-08-18
  • 通信作者: 荀江

Comparison of TAPP and Lichtenstein in inguinoscrotal hernia repair

Jiang Xun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Gaochun People's Hospital, Nanjing 211300, China
  • Received:2019-09-28 Published:2020-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Jiang Xun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xun Jiang, Email:
引用本文:

荀江. Lichtenstein和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟阴囊疝患者中的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 363-365.

Jiang Xun. Comparison of TAPP and Lichtenstein in inguinoscrotal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 363-365.

目的

比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与开放Lichtenstein手术,在腹股沟阴囊疝治疗中的疗效,并探讨其可行性及术后并发症的发生率。

方法

选择2016年1月至2018年12月,南京市高淳人民医院阴囊疝患者48例。按照术式不同分为TAPP组(20例)和Lichtenstein组(28例)。比较2组术中及术后并发症,包括手术时间、术中出血、术后疼痛、伤口及网片感染和术后复发等。

结果

本组患者均顺利完成手术。Lichtenstein组手术时间(59±12)min,TAPP组手术时间(56±9)min,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Lichtenstein组术中出血量(30.0±10.5)ml,TAPP组为(10.0±5.1)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Lichtenstein组住院时间(9.0±5.2)d,TAPP组(3.0±2.4)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Lichtenstein组术后疼痛VAS评分(术后1周)为(4.0±1.4)分,TAPP组(2.0±1.2)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者在随访期间均无补片感染、复发及慢性疼痛发生。Lichtenstein组切口并发症(浅表感染及血肿,渗血,渗液)6例,阴囊积液6例;TAPP组切口并发症0例,阴囊积液7例。均经过换药或者保守治疗,均治愈出院。

结论

TAPP可以进行腹股沟阴囊疝修补术,其疗效与腹股沟疝开放修补术相当,TAPP具有术后疼痛轻、伤口并发症少,住院时间较短的优点。

Objective

To compare the effect of the laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach and Lichtenstein approach in the treatment of scrotal inguinal hernia, and our results were focusing on the feasibility of the technique and the incidence of postoperative complications.

Methods

Between January 2016 and December 2018, a total of 48 scrotal hernia patients underwent either TAPP repair or Lichtenstein repair. And the intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared, including operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, wound and mesh infection, and recurrence.

Results

All procedures were performed successfully, and the overall mean operative time for TAPP was (56±9) minutes, for Lichtenstein was (59±12) minutes, the difference was not statistically significant P>0.05]. The intraoperative bleeding was more for Lichtenstein than TAPP [(30.0±10.5) ml vs (10.0±5.1) ml, (P<0.05), the hospital stay was shorter in TAPP group compared with Lichtenstein group [(9.0±5.2) days vs (3.0±2.4) days, P<0.05] and postoperative pain at 1 week after operation was less in TAPP (3.0±2.4), as compared with Lichtenstein (4.0±1.4), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no mesh infection, recurrence and chronic pain in the two groups. In the Lichtenstein group, there were 6 cases of wound complications (superficial infection and hematoma, blood oozing, and exudation), 6 cases of scrotal effusion. While there were no wound complications, 7 cases of scrotal effusion in the TAPP group. All patients were cured and discharged after dressing change or conservative treatment.

Conclusion

The TAPP can be performed for inguinoscrotal hernia repair with an efficiency comparable to that of open inguinal hernia repair, and the TAPP procedure was associated with less pain, wound complications, and short hospital stay.

[1]
Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P. Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: A retrospective analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005, 19(5): 724-727.
[2]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[3]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, et al. Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty(TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5): 2222-2231.
[4]
Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2003, 237(1): 142-147.
[5]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: A new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[6]
Berney CR. The endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach[J]. Hernia, 16(3): 301-305.
[7]
Ismail M, Garg M, Rajagopal M, et al. Impact of closed-suction drain in preperitoneal space on the incidence of seroma formation after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19(3): 263-266.
[8]
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, et al. Scrotal hernias: A contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? Results of a single-institution experience in transabdominal preperitoneal repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2000, 14(3): 289-292.
[9]
Misra MC, Bhowate PD, Bansal VK, et al. Massive scrotal hernias: problems and solutions[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009, 19(1): 19-22.
[10]
Fujinaka R, Urade T, Fukuoka E, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for giant inguinal hernias[J]. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(1): 414-419.
[11]
刘国忠,翁山耕,张建斌. 疝囊剥离与横断在男性腹股沟斜疝中的随机对照研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 264-267.
[12]
Patle NM, Tantia O, Prasad P, et al. Sliding inguinal hernias: scope of laparoscopic repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011, 21(3): 227-231.
[13]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 张继新, 胡军红, 谢爽, 武祖印, 张春旭. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术可行性及近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 460-465.
[15] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
阅读次数
全文


摘要