切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 359 -362. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.04.009

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术联合腹股沟区小切口在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用
石志良1, 沈成龙1, 俞铖1, 韩复1, 郭健1,()   
  1. 1. 215500 江苏省,常熟市第二人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-28 出版日期:2020-08-18
  • 通信作者: 郭健

Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair combined with inguinal small incision in the treatment of inguinal hernia

Zhiliang Shi1, Chenglong Shen1, Cheng Yu1, Fu Han1, Jian Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Changshu City, Changshu 215500, China
  • Received:2019-09-28 Published:2020-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Jian Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Jian, Email:
引用本文:

石志良, 沈成龙, 俞铖, 韩复, 郭健. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术联合腹股沟区小切口在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 359-362.

Zhiliang Shi, Chenglong Shen, Cheng Yu, Fu Han, Jian Guo. Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair combined with inguinal small incision in the treatment of inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 359-362.

目的

探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)联合腹股沟区小切口治疗难复性及嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年4月,常熟市第二人民医院62例一期行疝修补手术的单侧难复性或嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,其中行腹股沟区小切口联合TAPP修补术患者16例,行TAPP修补术患者21例,行开放无张力修补术患者25例。

结果

TAPP联合腹股沟区小切口组与TAPP组住院时间、手术时间、切口并发症、排尿困难及睾丸坏死发生率等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而在住院费用及术后阴囊/会阴肿胀发生率方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TAPP联合腹股沟区小切口组与开放组比较,在住院时间、术后切口并发症发生率及排尿困难发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而在住院费用、手术时间、其他术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TAPP联合腹股沟区小切口治疗难复性或嵌顿性腹股沟疝行可缩短住院时间或减少术后并发症的发生,值得在临床中应用推行。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) combined with inguinal small incision in the treatment of irreducible or incarcerated inguinal hernia.

Methods

The clinical data of 62 patients undergoing primary hernia repair in Changshu second people's Hospital from January 2016 to April 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 16 patients underwent TAPP repair combined with inguinal small incision, 21 patients underwent TAPP repair, and 25 patients underwent open tension-free repair.

Results

There were no differences in length of stay, operation time, wound complication, dysuria, and testicular ischemic necrosis between TAPP group and TAPP combined with inguinal small incision group (P>0.05). While in terms of hospitalization costs and the incidence of postoperative scrotal/perineum swelling, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with the open group with TAPP combined with inguinal small incision, there were statistically significant differences in hospital stay, postoperative wound complication rate and dysuria rate (P<0.05). While in terms of hospitalization costs, operation time, and other incidence of postoperative complications, the difference was not significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Treatment of irreducible or incarcerated inguinal hernia with TAPP combined with inguinal small incision can reduce hospitalization time or reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and it is worth applying in clinic.

表1 3组难复性及嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者临床资料比较
[1]
李盛海. 腹腔镜技术在疝外科的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2014, 30(10): 1665-1667.
[2]
陈双,江志鹏. 经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术技巧的探讨[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1015-1017.
[3]
唐健雄,李绍杰. 腹壁疝手术改进与修复材料学发展对疝外科的挑战[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1005-1009.
[4]
曹峰瑜,闵凯,吴彪, 等. 腹腔镜探查治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的应用体会[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2016, 24(1): 153-157.
[5]
黄建朋,陈亮,韩明福. 腹腔镜TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2016, 23(8): 998-999.
[6]
成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版) [J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(7): 807-811.
[7]
Amid PK. Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution and prineiples[J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(1): l-7.
[8]
Frunchaud H. Anatomie chirugicale des hernies de l'aine. Doin Paris, 1956, 299-303.
[9]
杨慧琪,刘敏,申英末. 2018年国际腹股沟疝指南解读:成人腹股沟疝管理(一) [J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12 (5): 321-325.
[10]
Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic(TAPP)and endoscopic(TEP)treatment of inguinal hernia[International Endohernia Society(IEHS)][J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(9): 2773-2843.
[11]
储修峰,徐妙军,吴志明, 等. 腹腔镜与开放手术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的比较研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(8): 613-617.
[12]
蔡昭,黄磊,李绍杰, 等. 经腹股沟切口路径放置补片疝修补术治疗急诊股疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1111-1115.
[13]
Hentati H, Dougaz W, Dziri C. Mesh repair versos non-mesh repair for strangulated inguinal hernia: systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(11): 2784-2790.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?