切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 160 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.016

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹壁切口疝并发肠梗阻的易感因素分析及防治措施
何学元1, 马建勋1,(), 俞泽元1   
  1. 1. 730000 兰州,甘肃省人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-28 出版日期:2020-04-18
  • 通信作者: 马建勋
  • 基金资助:
    项目名称:甘肃省科技计划项目(18JR3RA330)

Analysis of the susceptible factors of abdominal wall incisional hernia complicated with intestinal obstruction and its prevention and control measures

Xueyuan He1, Jianxun Ma1,(), Zeyuan Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2019-10-28 Published:2020-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jianxun Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Jianxun, Email:
引用本文:

何学元, 马建勋, 俞泽元. 腹壁切口疝并发肠梗阻的易感因素分析及防治措施[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 160-163.

Xueyuan He, Jianxun Ma, Zeyuan Yu. Analysis of the susceptible factors of abdominal wall incisional hernia complicated with intestinal obstruction and its prevention and control measures[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 160-163.

目的

探讨腹壁切口疝并发肠梗阻的易感因素及防治措施。

方法

选取2013年2月至2018年10月,甘肃省人民医院收治的52例腹壁切口疝患者为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床资料,根据患者术后是否并发肠梗阻分为发生肠梗阻组(30例)与未发生肠梗阻组(22例)。比较2组患者一般资料及围术期相关指标,筛选出肠梗阻发生的易感因素,总结其防治措施。

结果

发生肠梗阻组与未发生肠梗阻组在性别、是否合并急慢性支气管炎、是否合并前列腺炎方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组在年龄、手术类型、术前营养状况、切口类型、愈合类型、合并腹水及合并便秘者方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。发生肠梗阻组患者经治疗后腹痛消失时间为(3.40±1.78)d、腹胀消失时间为(4.24±1.57)d、排气时间为(5.96±1.61)d、进食流质时间为(6.95±2.02)d、胃肠减压引流量为(315.21±106.52)ml/d、平均住院时间为(14.59±2.63)d。

结论

腹壁切口疝并发肠梗阻的易感因素为男性、合并急慢性支气管炎或前列腺炎,但肠梗阻经及时干预治疗后患者症状及体征均得以显著改善,提示重视易感因素的控制、及早给予治疗是防治肠梗阻的关键。

Objective

To explore the susceptible factors of abdominal wall incisional hernia complicated with intestinal obstruction and its prevention and control measures.

Methods

52 patients with incisional hernia admitted to Gansu provincial people's hospital from February 2013 to October 2018 were selected as the research objects. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the patients complicated with intestinal obstruction after operation, they were divided into intestinal obstruction group (n=30) and no intestinal obstruction group (n=22). The general data and perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared, the susceptible factors of intestinal obstruction were screened out and the preventive and therapeutic measures were summarized.

Results

There were differences in gender, acute and chronic bronchitis and prostatitis between intestinal obstruction group and no intestinal obstruction group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of age, type of surgery, preoperative nutritional status, type of incision, type of healing, complicated with ascites and constipation (P>0.05). In the patients with intestinal obstruction, the disappearance time of abdominal pain was (3.40±1.78) days, the disappearance time of abdominal distension was (4.24±1.57) days, the exhaust time was (5.96±1.61) days, the time of fluid intake was (6.95±2.02) days, the gastrointestinal decompression and drainage flow was (315.21±106.52) ml/day, and the average hospitalization time was (14.59±2.63) days.

Conclusion

The susceptible factors of abdominal incisional hernia complicated with intestinal obstruction were male, complicated with acute and chronic bronchitis or prostatitis, but the symptoms and signs of patients with intestinal obstruction were significantly improved after timely intervention treatment. It is suggested that the key to prevent and treat intestinal obstruction is to pay attention to the control of susceptible factors and to give treatment as early as possible.

表1 2组腹壁切口疝患者一般资料比较
表2 2组腹壁切口疝患者术后易感因素比较[例(%)]
[1]
谢颂状,克力木·阿不都热依木,李赞林. 腹壁切口疝发病诱因与治疗研究进展[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2016, 30(10): 946-949.
[2]
Ferrarese A, Enrico S, Solej M, et al. Laparoscopic management of non-midline incisional hernia: A multicentric study[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 33(Suppl 1): S108-S113.
[3]
吴际,田世堂,梁冰. 腹膜前间隙放置补片修复治疗腹壁切口疝17例疗效观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2014, 38(7): 646-647.
[4]
谢新刚,杨堃,刘洁琼. 腹部术后常见并发症的超声诊断价值[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2016, 9(3): 239-241.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(7): 499-499.
[6]
邸玉芹,俞维宝,曲希侠. CT和X线在绞窄性肠梗阻诊断中的临床价值分析[J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(12): 2495-2496.
[7]
苏雅拉图. 急性阑尾炎并发肠梗阻手术的临床分析[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2017, 4(35): 83-83.
[8]
罗文,王勇,段鑫. 开放手术联合腹腔镜技术治疗腹壁嵌顿性或绞窄性切口疝11例疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(5): 563-565.
[9]
Yang PG, Tung LK. Preperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral abdominal wall and incisional hernia: a novel technique[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2016, 9(4): 344-347.
[10]
陈文,陈义加,付传明, 等. MSCT及后处理技术在腹外疝合并肠梗阻诊断中的应用价值[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2014, 23(1): 153-158.
[11]
周力,王晓辉,李小军, 等. 切口疝无张力修补术后复发的多因素分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2015, 22(8): 972-976.
[12]
Pecorelli N, Greco M, Amodeo S, et al. Small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative trials[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(1): 85-99.
[13]
Hong S, Bi MM, Zhao PW, et al. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in a patient with intestinal fistula, incisional hernia and abdominal infection: A case report[J]. Oncol Lett, 2016, 11(3): 2047-2050.
[14]
Nilsson JH, Strandberg HP, Sturesson C. Incisional hernia after open resections for colorectal liver metastases-incidence and risk factors[J]. HPB(Oxford), 2016, 18(5): 436-441.
[15]
张贤坤,杨清羽,刘宏斌, 等. 杂交技术在腹壁巨大切口疝中的应用体会[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015, 18(11): 892-893.
[1] 王涛, 冉新泽, 王军平. 放射复合伤的研究进展与展望[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 353-357.
[2] 赵海剑, 赵欣, 陈宁, 王健, 朱伦, 张晓雨, 黎珩. 不同状态小肠水通道蛋白3的表达分析及其临床意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 342-345.
[3] 陈飞, 韩奕, 罗喻文, 易小林, 李强. 腔镜甲状腺切除术后甲状旁腺功能减退的影响因素分析及防治策略[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 217-221.
[4] 邓欢, 曹博, 黄俊, 陈润开, 刘贵宾, 宋立强, 卫勃. 腹膜后肿瘤手术并发症及防治的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 371-375.
[5] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[6] 胡静, 范敏娟, 迟贯华. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术后腹内疝性肠梗阻的发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 401-405.
[7] 李青原, 冯同, 邱雪琴, 李万成. 迷迭香提取物防治肺纤维化研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 908-911.
[8] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[9] 白峻阁, 王玲玲, 陈海鹏, 刘正. 腹膜粘连的病因、机制及诊治进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 112-116.
[10] 倪乾洋, 邢雨彤, 于溯洋. 复杂性“三通”肠瘘一例报告并文献学习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 521-524.
[11] 张成仁, 吕耀春, 杜斌斌, 柳利利, 路继永, 王帅, 杨熊飞. 直肠癌前切除术后预置回肠造口与袢式回肠造口的对比研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 377-383.
[12] 宗晨曦, 肖林, 宋红欣. 人工智能视力筛查在近视眼防控中的应用研究与展望[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 60-64.
[13] 郑龙坡. 脆性骨折:老龄化带来的风险与挑战[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 321-324.
[14] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[15] 毛尔东, 杨金伟, 吴边, 尚云. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后胃漏的研究进展及诊治体会[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 55-61.
阅读次数
全文


摘要