切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 106 -109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.003

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜视野下的腹股沟区的解剖要点
闵凯1,(), 任骏1   
  1. 1. 420022 武汉市第一医院胃肠二外科疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-28 出版日期:2020-04-18
  • 通信作者: 闵凯

Anatomical key points of inguinal region in laparoscopic view

Kai Min1,(), Jun Ren1   

  1. 1. Second Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan 420022, China
  • Received:2019-07-28 Published:2020-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Kai Min
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Min Kai, Email:
引用本文:

闵凯, 任骏. 腹腔镜视野下的腹股沟区的解剖要点[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 106-109.

Kai Min, Jun Ren. Anatomical key points of inguinal region in laparoscopic view[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 106-109.

目的

对腹腔镜视野下对腹股沟区后壁的解剖结构进行观察,探讨腹腔镜下后入路腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝修补术的要点与难点。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年12月武汉市第一医院所完成的1500例腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补手术(LIHR)的视频资料,来对腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的手术路径、解剖标志、操作要点进行归纳总结。

结果

在1500例LIHR手术中,TEP方式为660例,TAPP方式为840例。TEP手术和TAPP手术具有不同的手术入路;两种方式的手术区域都在腹膜前间隙(包括Retzius和Bogros间隙);两种手术方式需要辨认相同的解剖标志:如耻骨梳韧带、腹壁下血管、精索结构或子宫圆韧带、Doom三角、死亡冠、髂外血管以及股外侧皮神经和生殖股神经等结构;两种手术方式均需要分离出足够大的腹膜前间隙范围,并正确分离处理疝囊,完成精索去腹膜化,使用10 cm×15 cm的聚丙烯网片完全覆盖整个肌耻骨孔(包括内环、直疝三角及股环)。

结论

TEP及TAPP手术都是LIHR的有效的修补方式,熟悉腹腔镜视野下腹股沟后壁的解剖特点,有利于缩短LIHR的学习曲线并更好的掌握该手术方式。

Objective

To observe the anatomical structures of the posterior wall of inguinal region in the view of laparoscopy, and to explore the main points and difficulties of the laparoscopic posterior approach to the preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

To collect and collate the video data of 1500 cases of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) from January 2013 to December 2018 in Wuhan No.1 hospital, and summarize the surgical approaches, anatomical signs, operating key points of laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) and laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP).

Results

In 1500 cases of LIHR, there were 660 cases of TEP and 840 cases of TAPP. TEP and TAPP methods had different surgical approaches, two modes of operation were in the preperitoneal space (including the Retzius and Bogros space); the two surgical methods need to identify the same anatomical signs: such as the pectineal ligament, the inferior epigastric vessels, the spermatic cord structure or the round ligament of the uterus, the Doom triangle, the corona mortis, the external iliac vessels, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and genitofemoral nerve; the two kinds of surgical methods need to separate enough range of the preperitoneal space, correctly separate the hernia sac, complete the deperitonealization to spermatic cord, and fully cover the whole myopectineal orifice (including the inner ring, Hesselbach's triangle and femoral ring) with the polypropylene mesh of 10 cm×15 cm.

Conclusion

The operation of TEP and TAPP are effective methods of LIHR. Familiarity with anatomical features of the posterior wall of the inguinal wall in the view of laparoscopy is beneficial to shorten the learning curve of LIHR and better grasp the operation.

图2 TAPP放置Torcar
图3 TEP手术入路
图7 腹膜皱襞
图11 左侧直疝
图14 缝合关闭腹膜(TAPP)
[1]
唐健雄. 腹外疝手术治疗规范化实施与质量控制标准[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(1): 55-58.
[2]
Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, et al. Chronic pain 5 years after randoized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(4): 600-608.
[3]
CastorinaS, Luca T, Privitera G, et al. An evidence-based approach for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from over 1, 000 repairs[J]. Clin Anat, 2012, 25(6): 687-696.
[4]
Bittner R, LeiblG J, Kraft B, et al. One year results of a prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia(TAPP)[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(5): 503-510.
[5]
Ferzli GS, Frezza EE, Pecoraro Jr AM, et al. Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1999, 5: 461-465.
[6]
Smith AI, Royston CM, Sedman PC. Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 1999, 8: 804-806.
[7]
Kapiris SA, Brough WA, Ryston CMS, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal TAPP hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15: 972-975.
[8]
Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, et al. Mata-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(12): 1479-1492.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?