切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.01.010

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

杂交技术对难复性腹股沟疝治疗效果的前瞻性随机对照研究
王保国1, 陈子辉1,(), 梁春芳1   
  1. 1. 065700 河北省,廊坊市第四人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-21 出版日期:2020-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈子辉

Hybrid technique for the treatment of irreducible inguinal hernia: A prospective randomized controlled study

Baoguo Wang1, Zihui Chen1,(), Chunfang Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Langfang Fourth People's Hospital, Hebei 065700, China
  • Received:2019-08-21 Published:2020-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Zihui Chen
引用本文:

王保国, 陈子辉, 梁春芳. 杂交技术对难复性腹股沟疝治疗效果的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 39-42.

Baoguo Wang, Zihui Chen, Chunfang Liang. Hybrid technique for the treatment of irreducible inguinal hernia: A prospective randomized controlled study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 39-42.

目的

对比杂交技术与单纯腹腔镜技术在难复性腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值。

方法

将2015年1月至2017年12月廊坊市第四人民医院收治的单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者共60例纳入本研究,采用随机法分为2组。其中试验组患者30例,采用杂交技术;对照组患者30例,采用腹腔镜技术。对比2组患者手术时间、气腹持续时间、术中出血量、住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症等指标。

结果

对照组1例患者因腹腔镜下难以分离还纳,后转为开放手术,淘汰出组,其余患者均顺利完成手术。试验组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者住院时间、住院费用、术后发热情况、异物感发生情况分别为(5.00±0.85)d、(10 901.8±830.22)元、5例(16.7%)、2例(6.7%),与对照组(5.00±0.82)d、(11 116.45±813.73)元、6例(20.7%)、2例(6.9%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。试验组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者手术时间、气腹持续时间、术中出血量、血清肿发生情况分别为(57.00±5.81)min、(36.30±4.90)min、(21.00±3.80)ml、1例(3.3%),与对照组(72.90±3.66)min、(65±4.43)min、(56.7±8.69)ml、7例(24.1%)比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.544、-6.698、-6.678、χ2=5.450,P均<0.05)。

结论

相对于腹腔镜技术,杂交技术治疗难复性腹股沟疝可减少手术时间、气腹持续时间和术中出血量,降低术后血清肿的发生,不会增加术后疝复发等并发症的风险和住院费用,具有较高的临床应用价值。

Objective

To compare the application value between Hybrid technique and laparoscopic technique in irreducible inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A total of 60 patients performed unilateral irreducible inguinal hernia repair in Langfang Fourth People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were included into this study. All patients were divided into two groups randomly, including Hybrid technique group (observation group, n=30) and laparoscopic technique group (control group, n=30). The operation time, pneumoperitoneum duration, blood loss, hospital stay, hospital cost, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

In the control group, 1 patient was rejected out of the group because it was difficult to separate and reduce under laparoscopy. The rest of operations were performed successfully. No statistical difference was observed in hospital stay [(5.00±0.85) days vs (5.00±0.82) days], hospital cost [(10 901.8±830.22) yuan vs (11 116.45±813.73) yuan], postoperative fever (16.7% vs 20.7%), pain (26.7% vs 6.9%) between two groups (P>0.05). Operation time, pneumoperitoneum duration, intraoperative bleeding and incidence of seroma in the observation group were (57.00±5.81) minutes, (36.30±4.90) minutes, (21.00±3.80) ml, 1 case (3.3%), respectively, were significantly lower than those in the control group, (72.90±3.66) minutes, (65±4.43) minutes, (56.7±8.69) ml, and 7 cases (24.1%), (P<0.05). No recurrence, infection or chronic pain was observed at 1 year follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopy, Hybrid technique to treat irreducible inguinal hernia may decrease operation time, pneumoperitoneum duration, intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of seroma, and do not increase the risk of postoperative hernia recurrence and other complications and hospital cost. It is worthy to be used for clinical practice.

表1 试验组和对照组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者一般资料比较
表2 试验组和对照组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者观察指标比较
[1]
曹金鑫,王明刚,朱熠林, 等. 应用腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝临床价值探讨[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017(11): 1250-1253.
[2]
唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰, 等. 我国疝和腹壁外科前景展望[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(1): 15-19.
[3]
Jakhmola CK, Kumar A. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Armed Forces: A 5-year single centre study[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2015, 71(4): 317-323.
[4]
Tsukada T, Saito H, Amaya K et al. Hybrid laparoscopic and anterior approach for postsurgical inguinal hernia after iliofemoral arterial bypass[J]. Int Surg, 2015, 100(3): 431-435.
[5]
Nitta T, Kinoshita T, Kataoka J, et al. Surgical technique of laparoscopic hybrid approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: Report a case[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2018, 50: 13-16.
[6]
Quezada N, Maturana G, Pimentel E, et al. Simultaneous TAPP inguinal repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a case series[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(1): 119-123.
[7]
Bittner R. [Evidence-based TAPP technique][J]. Chirurg, 2017, 88(4): 281-287.
[8]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal Preperitoneal(TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[9]
华伟,梁志宏,刘书强. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟难复性疝的临床研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2018(19): 19-22.
[10]
陈新, 等. 腔镜下腹膜外复位及TEP治疗腹股沟难复性疝临床研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2016(4): 443-446.
[11]
Yang S, Zhang G, Jin C, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic approach for incarcerated inguinal hernia repair: A report of 73 cases[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(52): e5686.
[12]
张贤坤,杨清羽,刘宏斌, 等. 杂交技术在腹壁巨大切口疝中的应用体会[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015(11): 892-893, 896.
[13]
汤福鑫,陈双.术前渐进性气腹在切口疝治疗中的应用[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018,12(4): 260-264.
[14]
郭锐,钟茂林,叶军明, 等. 腹腔镜二氧化碳气腹对全凭静脉麻醉中Narcotrend指数的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(14): 2143-2146.
[15]
计嘉军,高峡,付建柱, 等. 免气腹腹腔镜胆道探查术对患者凝血功能的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 816-820.
[16]
张云,郝晓晖,李健文, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10): 967-971.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要