切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.01.010

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

杂交技术对难复性腹股沟疝治疗效果的前瞻性随机对照研究
王保国1, 陈子辉1,(), 梁春芳1   
  1. 1. 065700 河北省,廊坊市第四人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-21 出版日期:2020-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈子辉

Hybrid technique for the treatment of irreducible inguinal hernia: A prospective randomized controlled study

Baoguo Wang1, Zihui Chen1,(), Chunfang Liang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Langfang Fourth People's Hospital, Hebei 065700, China
  • Received:2019-08-21 Published:2020-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Zihui Chen
引用本文:

王保国, 陈子辉, 梁春芳. 杂交技术对难复性腹股沟疝治疗效果的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 39-42.

Baoguo Wang, Zihui Chen, Chunfang Liang. Hybrid technique for the treatment of irreducible inguinal hernia: A prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 39-42.

目的

对比杂交技术与单纯腹腔镜技术在难复性腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值。

方法

将2015年1月至2017年12月廊坊市第四人民医院收治的单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者共60例纳入本研究,采用随机法分为2组。其中试验组患者30例,采用杂交技术;对照组患者30例,采用腹腔镜技术。对比2组患者手术时间、气腹持续时间、术中出血量、住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症等指标。

结果

对照组1例患者因腹腔镜下难以分离还纳,后转为开放手术,淘汰出组,其余患者均顺利完成手术。试验组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者住院时间、住院费用、术后发热情况、异物感发生情况分别为(5.00±0.85)d、(10 901.8±830.22)元、5例(16.7%)、2例(6.7%),与对照组(5.00±0.82)d、(11 116.45±813.73)元、6例(20.7%)、2例(6.9%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。试验组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者手术时间、气腹持续时间、术中出血量、血清肿发生情况分别为(57.00±5.81)min、(36.30±4.90)min、(21.00±3.80)ml、1例(3.3%),与对照组(72.90±3.66)min、(65±4.43)min、(56.7±8.69)ml、7例(24.1%)比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.544、-6.698、-6.678、χ2=5.450,P均<0.05)。

结论

相对于腹腔镜技术,杂交技术治疗难复性腹股沟疝可减少手术时间、气腹持续时间和术中出血量,降低术后血清肿的发生,不会增加术后疝复发等并发症的风险和住院费用,具有较高的临床应用价值。

Objective

To compare the application value between Hybrid technique and laparoscopic technique in irreducible inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A total of 60 patients performed unilateral irreducible inguinal hernia repair in Langfang Fourth People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were included into this study. All patients were divided into two groups randomly, including Hybrid technique group (observation group, n=30) and laparoscopic technique group (control group, n=30). The operation time, pneumoperitoneum duration, blood loss, hospital stay, hospital cost, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

In the control group, 1 patient was rejected out of the group because it was difficult to separate and reduce under laparoscopy. The rest of operations were performed successfully. No statistical difference was observed in hospital stay [(5.00±0.85) days vs (5.00±0.82) days], hospital cost [(10 901.8±830.22) yuan vs (11 116.45±813.73) yuan], postoperative fever (16.7% vs 20.7%), pain (26.7% vs 6.9%) between two groups (P>0.05). Operation time, pneumoperitoneum duration, intraoperative bleeding and incidence of seroma in the observation group were (57.00±5.81) minutes, (36.30±4.90) minutes, (21.00±3.80) ml, 1 case (3.3%), respectively, were significantly lower than those in the control group, (72.90±3.66) minutes, (65±4.43) minutes, (56.7±8.69) ml, and 7 cases (24.1%), (P<0.05). No recurrence, infection or chronic pain was observed at 1 year follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopy, Hybrid technique to treat irreducible inguinal hernia may decrease operation time, pneumoperitoneum duration, intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of seroma, and do not increase the risk of postoperative hernia recurrence and other complications and hospital cost. It is worthy to be used for clinical practice.

表1 试验组和对照组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者一般资料比较
表2 试验组和对照组单侧难复性腹股沟疝患者观察指标比较
[1]
曹金鑫,王明刚,朱熠林, 等. 应用腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝临床价值探讨[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017(11): 1250-1253.
[2]
唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰, 等. 我国疝和腹壁外科前景展望[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(1): 15-19.
[3]
Jakhmola CK, Kumar A. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Armed Forces: A 5-year single centre study[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2015, 71(4): 317-323.
[4]
Tsukada T, Saito H, Amaya K et al. Hybrid laparoscopic and anterior approach for postsurgical inguinal hernia after iliofemoral arterial bypass[J]. Int Surg, 2015, 100(3): 431-435.
[5]
Nitta T, Kinoshita T, Kataoka J, et al. Surgical technique of laparoscopic hybrid approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: Report a case[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2018, 50: 13-16.
[6]
Quezada N, Maturana G, Pimentel E, et al. Simultaneous TAPP inguinal repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a case series[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(1): 119-123.
[7]
Bittner R. [Evidence-based TAPP technique][J]. Chirurg, 2017, 88(4): 281-287.
[8]
Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, et al. Transabdominal Preperitoneal(TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 55.
[9]
华伟,梁志宏,刘书强. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟难复性疝的临床研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2018(19): 19-22.
[10]
陈新, 等. 腔镜下腹膜外复位及TEP治疗腹股沟难复性疝临床研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2016(4): 443-446.
[11]
Yang S, Zhang G, Jin C, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic approach for incarcerated inguinal hernia repair: A report of 73 cases[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(52): e5686.
[12]
张贤坤,杨清羽,刘宏斌, 等. 杂交技术在腹壁巨大切口疝中的应用体会[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015(11): 892-893, 896.
[13]
汤福鑫,陈双.术前渐进性气腹在切口疝治疗中的应用[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018,12(4): 260-264.
[14]
郭锐,钟茂林,叶军明, 等. 腹腔镜二氧化碳气腹对全凭静脉麻醉中Narcotrend指数的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(14): 2143-2146.
[15]
计嘉军,高峡,付建柱, 等. 免气腹腹腔镜胆道探查术对患者凝血功能的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 816-820.
[16]
张云,郝晓晖,李健文, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10): 967-971.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[11] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[12] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[13] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[14] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[15] 李博, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 汤坚强, 王锡山. 多功能吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES Ⅳ式)中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 524-528.
阅读次数
全文


摘要