切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 572 -576. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.06.023

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

胸腔镜治疗新生儿先天性膈疝的围手术期监护
朱海新1,(), 彭玲2   
  1. 1. 101149 首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院重症医学科
    2. 101399 北京中医医院顺义医院脑病科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-01 出版日期:2019-12-18
  • 通信作者: 朱海新

Perioperative nursing care of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated by thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair

Haixin Zhu1,(), Ling Peng2   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China
    2. Department of Encephalopathy, Shunyi Hospital, Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Beijing 101399, China
  • Received:2019-02-01 Published:2019-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Haixin Zhu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhu Haixin, Email:
引用本文:

朱海新, 彭玲. 胸腔镜治疗新生儿先天性膈疝的围手术期监护[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 572-576.

Haixin Zhu, Ling Peng. Perioperative nursing care of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated by thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 572-576.

目的

探究胸腔镜治疗新生儿先天性膈疝(CDH)的围手术期监护护理效果。

方法

选取2010年1月至2018年10月,首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院就诊的64例先天性膈疝患儿,随机分为综合护理组(32例)和常规护理组(32例),常规护理组给予围手术期常规护理,综合护理组则在此基础上给予综合护理。分别观测并比较2组患儿的围手术期指标、血气分析指标、舒适度、依从性以及护理质量评分和术后并发症发生情况。

结果

综合护理组患儿的手术时间、术中出血量分别为(114.29±11.54)min、(2.58±1.01)ml与常规护理组(116.83±12.73)min、(2.81±1.03)ml比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.862、0.900,P=0.392、0.356);综合护理组住院时间、术后机械通气时间(12.18±4.11)d、(2.04±1.17)d均低于常规护理组(17.52±5.25)d、(2.89±2.03)d,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.670、2.115,P<0.001、=0.038)。2组患儿血气指标在术前、气腹后10 min、放气后30 min 3个时间点组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。气腹后10 min与术前比较,2组患儿组内PaCO2、气道峰压、呼气末CO2分压均增加,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);放气后30 min与术前比较,2组患儿的PaCO2、气道峰压、呼气末CO2分压均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。综合护理组患儿的舒适度、依从性和护理质量评分分别为(91.05±10.22)分、(91.48±7.64)分和(93.11±10.08)分均高于常规护理组(81.69±9.81)分、(80.27±7.05)分和(80.97±8.19)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.853、6.288、5.450,P均<0.001)。综合护理组术后并发症的发生率(3.125%)低于常规护理组(21.875%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.143,P=0.023)。

结论

综合护理干预在胸腔镜膈疝修补术治疗新生儿CDH中具有重要作用,可明显缩短患儿术后恢复时间,使血气指标维持正常平稳,有效降低术后并发症的发生率,显著提高患儿的舒适度、依从性和护理满意度,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the effect of perioperative monitoring and nursing in the treatment of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) by thoracoscopic repair of diaphragmatic hernia.

Methods

64 children with CDH who were treated in Beijing Luhe hospital from January 2010 to October 2018 were randomly divided into the comprehensive nursing group (32 cases) and the routine nursing group (32 cases). The routine nursing group was given routine perioperative nursing, while the comprehensive nursing group was given comprehensive nursing on the basis of routine perioperative nursing. The perioperative indicators, blood gas analysis indicators, the scores of comfort, compliance, nursing quality and complications were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in operation time and bleeding volume between the comprehensive nursing group and the routine nursing group (114.29±11.54 min vs 116.83±12.73 min; 2.58±1.01 ml vs 2.81±1.03 ml, P>0.05), while the hospitalization time and mechanical ventilation time after operation in the comprehensive nursing group were lower than those in the routine nursing group (12.18±4.11 d vs 17.52±5.25 d; 2.04±1.17 d vs 2.89±2.03 d; P<0.05). There was no significant difference in blood gas between the two groups at three time points of pre-operation, 10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and 30 minutes after deflation (P>0.05). Compared with pre-operation, 10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, the levels of PaCO2, peak airway pressure and end-expiratory CO2 pressure increased in both groups (P<0.05). While there was no significant difference in PaCO2, peak airway pressure and end-expiratory CO2 pressure between the two groups when comparing pre-operation and 30 minutes after deflation (P>0.05). The scores of comfort (91.05±10.22), compliance (91.48±7.64) and nursing quality of children (93.11±10.08) in comprehensive nursing group were higher than those in routine nursing group (81.69±9.81, 80.27±7.05, and 80.97±8.19, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the comprehensive nursing group (3.125%) was lower than that in the conventional nursing group (21.875%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Comprehensive nursing intervention plays an important role in the treatment of neonatal CDH by thoracoscopic diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy. It can significantly shorten the recovery time after operation, keep the blood gas index normal and stable, effectively reduce the incidence of complications after operation, and significantly improve the comfort, compliance and nursing satisfaction of children. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组患儿围手术期指标比较(±s
表2 2组患儿血气指标比较(±s
表3 2组患儿舒适度、依从性和护理质量评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患儿术后并发症发生情况比较
[1]
Bonatti M, Lombardo F, Vezzali N, et al. Blunt diaphragmatic lesions: Imaging findings and pitfalls[J]. World J Radiol, 2016, 8(10): 819-828.
[2]
王宏琴,张美英,张玉环. 新生儿先天性膈疝伴动脉导管未闭3例的围手术期护理[J]. 安徽医药, 2016, 20(12): 2369-2371.
[3]
杨鸣,白科,符跃强, 等. 58例新生儿先天性膈疝围手术期监护[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(10): 1355-1357.
[4]
Danzer E1, Kim SS. Neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Evaluation, predictors and outcome[J]. World J Clin Pediatr, 2014, 3(3): 30-36.
[5]
代江涛,吴春,潘征夏, 等. 新生儿先天性膈疝诊治的回顾性分析[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2014, 39(9): 1264-1267.
[6]
蔡玉桃,李莎,吕俊健. 先天性膈疝患儿手术治疗的围手术期护理[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2017, 32(12): 1131-1133.
[7]
徐敏,成守珍,刘悦新, 等. 3例新生儿先天性膈疝子宫外产时处理术前及术中护理[J]. 现代临床护理, 2014, 13(2): 50-53.
[8]
魏延栋,马立霜. 先天性膈疝的诊治进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(6): 495-498.
[9]
钟微,何秋明,夏慧敏. 先天性膈疝生后手术治疗的演变与评价[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(7): 655-657+669.
[10]
周晓波,刘佳,赵成鹏, 等. 胸腔镜膈疝修补术和常规开放性手术在新生儿先天性膈疝中的对比研究[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(16): 117-121.
[11]
陈文科,侯昉,刘文英. 先天性膈疝的诊治进展[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(4): 530-534.
[12]
何靖. 新生儿先天性膈疝抢救1例[J]. 河北医药, 2015, 37(23): 3680.
[13]
吴晔明. 腔镜下新生儿膈疝修补术[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2017, 16(1): 15-17.
[14]
薛锋,廖和和,王鹏国, 等. 胸腔镜辅助下膈疝修补术临床研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2018, 47(2): 199-201+205.
[15]
胡华琨,李强,彭夕华, 等. 允许性高碳酸血症在新生儿胸腔镜先天性膈疝修补术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2014, 30(8): 766-769.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 李瑞琦, 吴子健, 吴杰斌, 任佳佳, 翟敬芳. 动脉血气分析判读Excel电子表格在实习生酸碱平衡紊乱教学中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 737-743.
阅读次数
全文


摘要