切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 529 -532. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.06.012

所属专题： 文献；

临床论著

负压封闭引流治疗腹壁感染创面的临床效果分析
王文礼1, 黄永红2,†()   
  1. 1. 014010　包头，内蒙古包钢医院全科
    2. 014010　包头，内蒙古包钢医院药剂科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-28 出版日期:2019-12-18
  • 通信作者: 黄永红

Clinical effect analysis of vacuum sealing drainage in treatment of abdominal wall wounds infection

Wenli Wang1, Yonghong Huang2,†()   

  1. 1. General practice, Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia, Baotou 014010, China
    2. Pharmacy Department, Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia, Baotou 014010, China
  • Received:2018-09-28 Published:2019-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Yonghong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Yonghong, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王文礼, 黄永红. 负压封闭引流治疗腹壁感染创面的临床效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 529-532.

Wenli Wang, Yonghong Huang. Clinical effect analysis of vacuum sealing drainage in treatment of abdominal wall wounds infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 529-532.

目的

探讨负压封闭引流（VSD）治疗腹壁感染创面的临床效果。

方法

选取2014年12月至2016年1月，内蒙古包钢医院收治的70例腹壁感染创面患者为研究对象，依据随机数字表法将其分为观察组与对照组，每组35例。观察组采用VSD进行治疗，对照组采取常规治疗。比较2组创口愈合时间、住院天数、换药次数及换药费用，统计治疗过程中并发症发生情况。

结果

观察组创口愈合时间和住院时间分别为（10.42±4.09）d、（20.52±3.59）d，与对照组（17.75±6.32）d、（28.40±4.27）d比较，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；观察组换药次数和换药费用分别为（10.45±2.70）次和（1002.43±188.69）元，均显著少于对照组（16.03±5.04）次、（2481.30±310.55）元，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组治疗过程中2例横结肠患者发生创周张力性水疱，消毒后抽取疱液，再次置入敷料时加垫纱布，1周后拆除VSD材料，水疱区域完全愈合。

结论

VSD治疗腹壁感染创面的临床效果优于常规治疗，可有效促进患者康复，因此值得推广应用。

关键词: 负压封闭引流, 腹壁感染创面, 临床效果
Objective

To explore the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of abdominal wall wounds infection.

Methods

70 patients with abdominal wall wounds infection in Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital from December 2014 to January 2016 were selected as the study objects, and the patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to random number table method, with 35 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with VSD, while the control group was treated with routine therapy. The time of wound healing time, hospitalization days, the number of dressing change and the cost of dressing change were compared between the two groups. The occurrence of complications in the course of treatment were statistically analyzed.

Results

The wound healing time and hospitalization days in the observation group (10.42±4.09) days were significantly shorter than those in the control group (20.52±3.59) days, and the number of dressing changes (10.45±2.70) times and the cost of dressing changes (1002.43±188.69) yuan in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group [(16.03±5.04) times, (2481.30±310.55) yuan; P<0.05]. In the observation group, two patients with transverse colon developed tension blisters around the wound. After sterilization, the blister fluid was extracted, and the gauze was added to the dressing. After one week, the VSD material were removal and blister area were completely healed.

Conclusion

The clinical effect of VSD in the treatment of abdominal wall wounds infection is better than that of routine treatment, and it can effectively promote the recovery of patients, so it is worth popularizing and applying.

Key words: Vacuum sealing drainage, Abdominal wall wound infection, Clinical effect
[1]
吴信，尚显文，张皓, 等. 抗生素联合负压封闭引流治疗腰椎内固定术后早期切口深部感染10例分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2015, 39(12): 1107-1109.
[2]
Wang J, Zhang H, Wang S. Application of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of internal fixation instrument exposure after early postoperative infection[J]. Minerva Chir, 2015, 70(1): 17-22.
[3]
王先美，郭永洪. 高血压脑出血血肿引流术患者收缩压变异性增大的影响因素[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2016, 41(12): 1482-1484.
[4]
Ni J, Liu H, Liu X, et al. Vacuum sealing drainage as treatment of severe buttocks and perianal infection: a case report and review of the literature(care-compliant)[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(43): e1766-e1766.
[5]
张亚男. 疝与腹壁外科[M]. 西安: 第四军医大学出版社, 2008: 155-162.
[6]
杨红英，何华. 外伤后腹壁皮肤软组织严重缺损创面1例行VSD引流的护理[J]. 中国冶金工业医学杂志, 2016, 33(2): 167-168.
[7]
张杰，林龙英，王家兴. 负压封闭引流技术在腹部创伤伤口感染中的应用[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2017, 23(5): 557-558.
[8]
温皇鼎，李志清，张美光, 等. 负压封闭引流联合含氧液冲洗对下肢慢性静脉性溃疡患者创面的影响[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2015, 31(2): 86-92.
[9]
石穗岩，张曙光，王明海. 不同引流方式在腹部手术感染切口治疗中的应用[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25(9): 2074-2076.
[10]
张美光，李志清，王甲汉, 等. 负压封闭引流联合含氧液冲洗修复糖尿病患者慢性创面的效果观察[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2014, 30(2): 116-123.
[11]
Pang LM, Kong FB, Wang XT, et al. Efficacy of Vacuum Sealing Drainage after Incision of Perianal Abscess: Preliminary Experience[J]. Am Surgeon, 2015, 81(11): 379-379.
[12]
陈锦锋，张兰. 负压封闭引流技术在预防腹部Ⅲ类切口感染中的运用[J]. 四川医学, 2014, 35(2): 173-175.
[13]
Yuan XG, Zhang X, Fu YX, et al. Sequential therapy with "vacuum sealing drainage-artificial dermis implantation-thin partial thickness skin grafting" for deep and infected wound surfaces in children[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(3): 369-373.
[14]
樊俊斌，蔺岗，刘文学. 负压封闭引流敷料在腹腔间隔室综合征腹壁缺损中的应用[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2017, 17(6): 884-886.
[15]
李鸣，叶祥柏，于燕, 等. 负压封闭引流治疗腹壁感染创面的临床观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2015, 19(2): 145-149.
[1] 赵雅玫, 谢斌, 陈艳, 吴健. 抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流对糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 427-433.
[2] 吴萍, 刘永林, 陈能彬, 季明军, 万晓波. 应用皮瓣联合负压封闭引流及灌洗引流治疗胫骨骨折术后钢板外露的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 317-320.
[3] 王婷, 刘婧妮, 程金梅. 心理护理干预对二氧化碳点阵激光联合富血小板血浆美容效果的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(05): 415-418.
[4] 郁莹, 张皓, 曾晓莉, 江一巍, 易芳羽, 翁清清, 张颖. 基于风险评估的6岁儿童龋病分级管理临床效果评价[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 345-352.
[5] 窦海鹏, 姚兴伟, 柴亮听. 改良直肠黏膜剥除肌层折叠术联合吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的效果分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 106-110.
[6] 张春宇, 刘葳. 4C护理模式在腹股沟疝日间手术术后并发症患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 565-567.
[7] 赵春, 姚宏芹. 腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术后迟发性深部感染的外科治疗[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 425-428.
[8] 肖泽林, 高健齐, 刘家杰, 曾定科. 负压封闭引流术治疗胸壁结核的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 397-399.
[9] 夏雪霞, 张黎雯, 任明星. 疏清颗粒联合阿奇霉素治疗小儿肺炎支原体感染的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 548-550.
[10] 娄红超, 谢汉华, 卢乃棉. 泛福舒对老年COPD患者的肺功能和细胞免疫力的分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 315-317.
[11] 高尔涵, 张硕, 齐岩松, 王一帆. 3D打印个别托盘在全口义齿修复中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 255-259.
[12] 臧宇, 姚胜, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频清创联合负压封闭引流对腹壁术后切口感染的临床效果[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 37-42.
[13] 陈慧娟, 陈然, 金平, 吴章松, 刘勇, 徐菲, 赵启媛. 口服阿司匹林联合替罗非班对老年进展性缺血性脑卒中患者功能转归的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 922-927.
[14] 俞春波. 自动定量弹力线痔套扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期环状混合痔的临床观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(07): 557-561.
[15] 李康荣, 杨鸣宇, 魏水生. DSA低剂量技术在肥胖冠心病患者行PCI手术的临床效果观察[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 93-98.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号