复合补片修补腹壁肿瘤切除后巨大腹壁缺损的临床疗效

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.04.013

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 335 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.04.013

所属专题：文献；

论著

复合补片修补腹壁肿瘤切除后巨大腹壁缺损的临床疗效

彭靖淇¹^,^†(

), 张静², 金武勇¹, 史志涛¹, 胡悦¹, 李鸿晨¹, 孙昕¹

^1. 830002　乌鲁木齐，新疆医科大学第四附属医院普外科
^2. 830002　乌鲁木齐，新疆医科大学第四附属医院病理科

收稿日期:2018-12-09 出版日期:2019-08-18
通信作者: 彭靖淇
基金资助:
新疆医科大学科研创新基金项目(ZYY201702)

Clinical effect of composite mesh for repairing massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection

Jingqi Peng¹^,^†(), Jing Zhang², Wuyong Jin¹, Zhitao Shi¹, Yue Hu¹, Hongchen Li¹, Xin Sun¹

^1. Department of General surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830002, China
^2. Department of pathology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830002, China

Received:2018-12-09 Published:2019-08-18
Corresponding author: Jingqi Peng
About author:
Corresponding author: Peng Jingqi, Email: 702577654@qq.com

全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用

引用本文：

彭靖淇, 张静, 金武勇, 史志涛, 胡悦, 李鸿晨, 孙昕. 复合补片修补腹壁肿瘤切除后巨大腹壁缺损的临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 335-338.

Jingqi Peng, Jing Zhang, Wuyong Jin, Zhitao Shi, Yue Hu, Hongchen Li, Xin Sun. Clinical effect of composite mesh for repairing massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 335-338.

目的

探讨复合补片修补腹壁肿瘤切除后巨大腹壁缺损的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年2月至2017年8月，新疆医科大学第四附属医院收治的55例腹壁肿瘤切除术后巨大腹壁缺损患者临床资料，根据植入补片的不同分为试验组（35例）和对照组（20例），2组患者均行腹壁肿瘤切除术，试验组植入Proceed补片，对照组植入Composix Kugel补片。比较2组手术相关临床参数、手术前后不同时间疼痛程度、切口愈合情况、并发症、肿瘤复发及转移情况。

结果

2组铺置补片时间及术后自主活动时间比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后12 h至7 d，2组患者视觉模拟评分均呈逐渐降低趋势，且均明显低于术前（P<0.05），但2组间均无明显差异（P>0.05）。拆线后伤口均达到一期愈合，2组总并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。随访1年，试验组肿瘤原位复发1例，对照组肿瘤远处转移1例，2组患者腹壁修复材料腹腔面光滑，且均未见腹壁修复材料与肠管黏连。

结论

采用Proceed补片和Composix Kugel补片对腹壁肿瘤切除后巨大腹壁缺损进行修复和重建，效果均较好，安全性高。

关键词: 复合补片, 腹壁肿瘤切除术, 巨大腹壁缺损, 疗效

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of composite mesh for repairing massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection.

Methods

The clinical data of 55 patients with massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from February 2015 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, they were divided into the experiment group (n=35) and the control group (n=20) according to the different mesh implanted. The two groups underwent abdominal wall tumor resection, the experiment group was implanted with Johnson Proceed mesh, the control group was implanted with Bard Composix Kugel mesh. The clinical parameters, pain degree at different time before and after surgery, the situation of healing of the incision, complications, tumor recurrence and metastasis in the two groups were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in time of implanting mesh and postoperation spontaneous activity time between the two groups (P>0.05). The visual analogue score (VAS) from 12 hours to 7 days of postoperation gradually decreased in the two groups (P<0.05), and which were significantly lower than of preoperation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). After suture removed, the wounds all reached the first stage of healing, there was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The follow-up period was 1 year, there was one case of tumor recurrence in the experiment group, one case of distant metastasis in the control group. The abdominal wall repair material was smooth, and no adhesion between the abdominal wall repair material and the intestinal tube was observed in the two groups.

Conclusion

The clinical effect of restoration and reconstruction of massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection using Johnson Proceed mesh or Bard Composix Kugel mesh is good and safety.

Key words: Composite mesh, Abdominal wall tumor resection, Massive abdominal wall defect, Efficacy

表1 2组患者手术前后不同时间视觉模拟评分比较（分，±s）

组别	例数	术前	术后12 h	术后24 h	术后3 d	术后7 d
试验组	35	7.59±1.44	6.48±1.39^a	6.04±1.10^a	3.28±0.96^a	2.10±0.85^a
对照组	20	7.36±1.61	6.29±1.55^a	6.17±1.25^a	3.37±1.07^a	2.04±0.94^a
P值	?	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表1 2组患者手术前后不同时间视觉模拟评分比较（分，±s）

组别	例数	术前	术后12 h	术后24 h	术后3 d	术后7 d
试验组	35	7.59±1.44	6.48±1.39^a	6.04±1.10^a	3.28±0.96^a	2.10±0.85^a
对照组	20	7.36±1.61	6.29±1.55^a	6.17±1.25^a	3.37±1.07^a	2.04±0.94^a
P值	?	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

[1]	杨建军, 宋致成, 王惠春, 等. 基于腹壁缺损分型的腹壁恶性肿瘤切除术后巨大腹壁缺损的一期修复重建[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(9): 728-731.
[2]	陈剑英. 人工补片在腹部恶性肿瘤手术中修复腹部缺损的远期疗效[J]. 实用临床医学, 2014, 15(6): 61-63.
[3]	高建军, 罗逸潜, 林楠. 手术切除联合补片一期修补治疗侵及肠管巨大腹壁硬纤维瘤[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14(10): 875-876.
[4]	高磊, 陶宗玉, 葛东, 等. 临床外科学[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 2013: 134-136.
[5]	胡学庆, 邵哲人, 姜方震, 等. 肿瘤切除后胸腹壁缺损的整形外科修复[C]// 浙江省美容整形学术会议暨浙江省首届美容整形医师大会. 2014.
[6]	胡星辰, 李绍杰, 唐健雄, 等. 开放性补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝636例疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(5): 413-415.
[7]	严志龙, 王元宇, 王永向, 等. 复合补片(Proceed)在腹腔镜腹壁巨大切口疝修补术中的应用体会[C]// 浙江省外科学学术年会. 2014.
[8]	戴谦诚, 仇雅琴, 龚鼎铨. 阔筋膜张肌肌皮瓣结合补片一期修复中下腹壁肿瘤切除术后巨大缺损13例分析[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2015, 14(5): 518-520.
[9]	张永生, 李鹏飞, 董海峰, 等. 双阔筋膜张肌肌皮瓣联合左股直肌肌皮瓣修复电烧伤后下腹壁巨大缺损一例[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2017, 33(8): 510-511.
[10]	胡礼, 方雷, 严志龙. 腹壁巨大肿瘤切除一期腹壁重建一例报告[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(4): 314-316.
[11]	丁建忠, 徐峰, 辛忠林, 等. 运用补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝21例治疗体会[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2014, 22(7): 67-68.
[12]	Bontinck J, Kyleleinhase I, Pletinckx P, et al. Single centre observational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Proceed™ Ventral Patch to repair small ventral hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(5): 671-680.
[13]	Takahashi N. Reconstructive Method after Resection of Chest Wall, Diaphragm and Pericardium, mainly using Composix-Mesh[J]. J Thora Surg 2014, 67(11): 995-1001.
[14]	Zarmpis N, Wassenberg D, Ambe PC. Repair of Small and Medium Size Umbilical Hernias with the "Proceed Ventral Patch" in the Preperitoneal Position[J]. Am Surg, 2015, 81(11): 1144-1148.

[1]	张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2]	莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[3]	索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4]	唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5]	汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[6]	顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[7]	邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[8]	徐红莉, 杨钰琳, 薛清, 张茜, 马丽虹, 邱振刚. 体外冲击波治疗非特异性腰痛疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 307-314.
[9]	梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[10]	高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[11]	姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[12]	张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[13]	杨镠, 秦岚群, 耿茜, 李栋庆, 戚春建, 蒋华. 可溶性免疫检查点对胃癌患者免疫治疗疗效和预后的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 305-311.
[14]	盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[15]	李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical effect of composite mesh for repairing massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical effect of composite mesh for repairing massive abdominal wall defect after abdominal wall tumor resection