切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 415 -422. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.04.012

论著

苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼在老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果
魏立国(), 张英立, 张婧   
  1. 300211 天津医科大学第二医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-08 出版日期:2026-08-18
  • 通信作者: 魏立国

The application effect of remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly

Liguo Wei(), Yingli Zhang, Jing Zhang   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
  • Received:2026-03-08 Published:2026-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Liguo Wei
引用本文:

魏立国, 张英立, 张婧. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼在老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 415-422.

Liguo Wei, Yingli Zhang, Jing Zhang. The application effect of remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 415-422.

目的

探讨苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼在老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果。

方法

本研究为前瞻性、非随机对照试验。纳入2024年1月至2026年1月,天津医科大学第二医院拟行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的老年患者100例。采用便利抽样法,按入组时间交替分配(奇数入组者为对照组,偶数入组者为试验组)。试验组(n=50)采用苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼麻醉方案,对照组(n=50)采用丙泊酚复合舒芬太尼麻醉方案。本研究采用单盲设计。分别于术前及术后24、48 h评估患者的认知功能[蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)]、镇静镇痛效果[Ramsay镇静评分(RSS)、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分]、血清应激反应指标[肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇],以及围手术期血流动力学指标[麻醉诱导前5 min(T0)、气管插管后5 min(T1)、建立气腹后5 min(T2)、手术结束拔除气管导管后5 min(T3)的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率],并记录围手术期麻醉药物使用及并发症发生情况。

结果

与对照组比较,试验组主要结局指标(术后24 h MoCA评分)、次要结局指标术后48 h MoCA及术后24、48 h的MMSE评分均更高;术后24、48 h,试验组RSS、VAS评分均较对照组更优,血清肾上腺素、NE及皮质醇水平均更低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组T1、T2时MAP、心率较对照组均更稳定(P<0.05)。试验组围手术期丙泊酚总用量明显低于对照组(P<0.001)。2组患者围手术期并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.084,P=0.298)。

结论

本研究初步提示,苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼用于老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术可改善患者术后早期认知功能、镇静镇痛可靠、能维持血流动力学稳定、术后应激反应小,且未增加严重不良事件发生率。但上述结论尚需大样本、多中心随机对照试验进一步验证。

Objective

To investigate the effects of remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

This study is a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from January 2024 to January 2026 were included. Patients were alternately assigned according to the time of enrollment into an experimental group (remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil, n=50) or a control group (propofol combined with sufentanil, n=50) using convenient sampling (those with odd numbers were assigned to the control group, while those with even numbers were assigned to the experimental group). This study adopted a single blind design. Cognitive function [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)], sedation and analgesic effects [Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score], and serum stress response indicators [adrenaline, norepinephrine (NE), cortisol] were assessed before surgery, and at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters [mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate at 5 min before anesthesia induction (T0), 5 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 5 min after pneumoperitoneum establishment (T2), and 5 min after tracheal extubation at the end of surgery (T3)] were recorded. The perioperative consumption of anesthetics and the occurrence of perioperative complications were also recorded.

Results

Compared with the control group, the experimental group exhibited higher scores in the primary outcome indicator (24 h postoperative MoCA score) and secondary outcome indicators (48 hours postoperative MoCA score, as well as 24 and 48 hours postoperative MMSE scores). At 24 and 48 hours after surgery, the experimental group had better RSS and VAS scores, alongside lower serum levels of adrenaline, NE and cortisol; all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The MAP and heart rate at T1 and T2 were more stable in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). The total perioperative propofol consumption was significantly lower in the experimental group than that in the control group (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups (χ2=1.084, P=0.298).

Conclusion

This study preliminarily indicates that remimazolam besylate combined with sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can improve early postoperative cognitive function, offer reliable sedation and analgesia, stabilize hemodynamics and attenuate postoperative stress response, with no elevated risk of serious adverse events. However, further large-sample, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

表1 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者基线资料比较
表2 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者手术前后认知功能比较(分,±s
表3 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者手术前后Ramsay镇静评分和疼痛评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者手术前后血流动力学比较(±s
表5 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血清应激指标比较(±s
表6 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者围手术期麻醉药物用量比较(±s
表7 2组老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
朱越欣, 程颖, 杨建华, 等. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑、丙泊酚分别复合舒芬太尼在老年患者无痛胃镜检查中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2024, 44(17): 4131-4135.
[2]
王伟, 石军, 王影, 等. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼对老年患者腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术后认知功能和炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2025, 31(1): 57-64.
[3]
Wu X, Zeng L, Zhang T, et al. The study of different dosages of remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol on painless gastroscopy: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2023, 102(34): e34731.
[4]
Wu X, Chen Y, Luo T, et al. The Study of Remazolam Combined With Propofol on Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Perianesth Nurs, 2025, 40(2): 281-287.
[5]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组, 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(1): 1-8.
[6]
俞晓东, 张文奇, 康文越, 等. 瑞马唑仑联合舒芬太尼对行胸腔镜手术患者炎症因子及疼痛介质和应激反应指标水平的影响[J]. 中国医药, 2022, 17(1): 93-97.
[7]
王东玉. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑对经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术老年患者麻醉的临床观察[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2023.
[8]
张淼淼. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑应用于行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术老年患者麻醉的临床观察[J/OL]. 临床普外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(1): 50-54.
[9]
许会贤. 瑞马唑仑对老年腹腔镜手术患者术后认知功能、炎症反应及TLR4/NF-κB信号通路的影响[J]. 中国处方药, 2024, 22(9): 146-149.
[10]
赵建华, 王玲, 李梅, 等. 瑞马唑仑对老年髋关节置换术后患者苏醒质量、炎症应激及术后谵妄的影响[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2024, 40(3): 335-339.
[11]
Liu Y, Wang D, Chi W, et al. Study on the combination of remazolam besylate and sufentanil in elderly patients with percutaneous vertebroplasty[J]. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev, 2024, 40(2): 1155-1163.
[12]
李璐, 周杨. 瑞马唑仑用于全身麻醉下全髋关节置换术中对老年患者血流动力学及术后认知功能的影响[J/OL]. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志, 2024, 8(22): 90-92.
[13]
杨婉, 孔令锁, 陈兰仁. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(20): 2665-2669.
[14]
张学湖, 徐振东, 陈佩佩, 等. 瑞马唑仑对老年患者无痛支气管镜检查的麻醉效果影响[J]. 中国现代医生, 2024, 62(3): 78-82.
[15]
石敏, 韩鹏, 袁洪蕾. 瑞马唑仑对老年腹腔镜手术患者应激反应指标与术后认知功能的影响评估[J]. 中外医疗, 2024, 43(10): 14-17.
[16]
Ulutas ME, Yilmaz AH. Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 179.
[17]
Xi S, Chen Z, Lu Q, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open inguinal-hernia repair in elderly patients: the experience of two comprehensive medical centers over 10 years[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(4): 1195-1203.
[18]
Damani T, Ray JJ, Farag M, et al. Elective paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly patients: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP database for contemporary morbidity and mortality[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(2): 1407-1413.
[19]
Lunardi N, Abou-Zamzam A, Florecki KL, et al. Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery[J]. JAMA Surg, 2024, 159(5): 493-499.
[20]
Lee SR. Laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair for asymptomatic contralateral occult inguinal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(4): 1249-1255.
[1] 李牧言, 张树庚, 刘连新. 腹腔镜全尾状叶切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 323-323.
[2] 马禧圆, 母德安, 曾少杰, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创腹腔镜IV段肝肿瘤切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 325-325.
[3] 尚培中, 张克俭, 聂阿娜, 张克勤, 刘冰, 李晓武. 胆总管活动度的临床意义及其在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 319-322.
[4] 严雨楼, 洪晟乾, 苏显, 王硕, 祁付珍, 徐建波. 不同手术操作腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 326-330.
[5] 杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 周烨, 杨建玲. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 343-346.
[6] 杨敏, 杜峻峰, 辛林璞. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 352-355.
[7] 张浩然, 王实现, 王凯, 缪骥. SSLA治疗复发性阑尾炎的疗效与手术时间因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 379-383.
[8] 吕定阳, 王玘葳, 双卫兵. 机器人辅助后腹腔镜肾部分切除术的技巧体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 383-388.
[9] 谢启帆, 刘志烨, 叶楚津, 谢海标, 韦琨, 钟方千俞, 蒲小勇. 吲哚菁绿荧光引导机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 445-450.
[10] 苏德强, 田晓丰, 李梓康, 杨佳, 丁绪鹏, 曹宏. 血液病脾切除治疗中的热点问题与发展方向[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 515-522.
[11] 李中宇, 杨谨闻, 麻勇. 微创脾部分切除术的发展现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 545-550.
[12] 徐荣, 韩伟, 张威. 单孔腹腔镜脾部分切除术的临床应用:微创革新与功能保全[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 551-557.
[13] 韩晓钊, 杨能红, 韩民, 李永宁, 冉勋, 张宏, 何志伟, 罗加农, 喻超. 机器人与腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术安全性及疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 568-574.
[14] 刘澳华, 刘苏, 李北平, 孙媛媛. 奥赛利定复合丙泊酚对老年无痛胃镜检查患者麻醉效果及苏醒质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 361-366.
[15] 吴清海, 喻晓敏, 王珊, 李玉珍, 孔俊丽. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与环泊酚用于胸腔镜食管癌切除术的倾向性评分匹配研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 367-373.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?