切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 74 -79. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.01.014

论著

嵌顿性腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中转开腹的危险因素分析
陈棋淋, 黄健斌, 刘莉文, 张升敏()   
  1. 510800 广州市花都区人民医院肝胆胰疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-28 出版日期:2026-02-18
  • 通信作者: 张升敏
  • 基金资助:
    广西慢性病代谢重塑与智能医学工程重点实验室开放课题(KFKT2025002); 广州市医学重点学科建设项目(2025-2027年)

Analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia

Qilin Chen, Jianbin Huang, Liwen Liu, Shengmin Zhang()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Hernia Surgery, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510800, China
  • Received:2025-05-28 Published:2026-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Shengmin Zhang
引用本文:

陈棋淋, 黄健斌, 刘莉文, 张升敏. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中转开腹的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 74-79.

Qilin Chen, Jianbin Huang, Liwen Liu, Shengmin Zhang. Analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 74-79.

目的

探讨嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的中转开腹情况及相关危险因素。

方法

选择2020年1月至2024年12月在广州市花都区人民医院疝和腹壁外科住院治疗的101例嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者(其中完全行TAPP术患者79例,腹腔镜中转开腹患者22例),结合2组间临床数据,来探讨行TAPP术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝的中转开腹情况,采用单因素和多因素分析影响中转开腹的相关危险因素,并以此制定预测模型。

结果

嵌顿性腹股沟疝行TAPP中转开腹的发生与性别、吸烟史、腹股沟疝的发病时间、疝环直径、腹腔积液、C反应蛋白、肠梗阻、疝的大小等存在相关性。且二元多因素logistical回归分析中可见C反应蛋白(OR=1.43,95% CI 1.18~1.72)、腹腔积液(OR=1.24,95% CI 1.01~3.18)是嵌顿性腹股沟疝行TAPP中转开腹的独立危险因素,根据危险因素制定的预测模型,经500次模型验证,与实际观测结果存在良好的一致性,具有统计学价值。

结论

嵌顿性腹股沟疝中转开腹与性别、吸烟史、腹股沟疝的发病时间、疝环直径、腹腔积液、C反应蛋白、肠梗阻、疝的大小等存在相关性。嵌顿性腹股沟疝宜尽早手术治疗,当患者C反应蛋白升高>11.85 mg/L或出现腹腔积液时,应提前做好开腹准备。

Objective

To investigate the conversion to open surgery and related risk factors in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) hernioplasty.

Methods

A total of 101 patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia who were hospitalized in the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou from January 1, 2020 to December 30, 2024 were selected. Among them, 79 patients underwent complete TAPP surgery and 22 patients were in the laparoscopic conversion to open surgery group. Clinical data of the two groups were analyzed to explore the status of conversion to open surgery in TAPP for incarcerated inguinal hernia. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify relevant risk factors for conversion to open surgery, and a predictive model was established accordingly.

Results

The conversion to open surgery in TAPP for incarcerated inguinal hernia was correlated with gender, smoking history, onset time of hernia, hernia ring diameter, peritoneal effusion, C-reactive protein (CRP), intestinal obstruction, and hernia size. Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that CRP (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.18-1.72) and peritoneal effusion (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.01-3.18) were independent risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia undergoing TAPP. The predictive model established based on these risk factors showed good consistency with actual observation results after 500 model validations, indicating statistical significance.

Conclusion

Conversion to open surgery in incarcerated inguinal hernia is correlated with gender, smoking history, onset time of hernia, hernia ring diameter, peritoneal effusion, CRP, intestinal obstruction, and hernia size. Early surgical treatment is recommended for incarcerated inguinal hernia. When a patient's CRP level exceeds 11.85 mg/L, or when peritoneal effusion is present, preparations for open surgery should be made in advance.

表1 TAPP治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝中转开腹单因素分析
指标 总计(101例) 完全TAPP组(79例) TAPP中转开腹组(22例) t/U/χ2 P
年龄[年,M(Q1,Q3)] 65.00(50.00,77.00) 64.00(51.00,74.50) 67.50(45.75,83.50) 0.417 0.518
性别[例(%)]       6.403 0.011
女性 16(15.84) 9(10.13) 7(31.82)    
男性 85(84.15) 70(89.87) 15(68.18)    
吸烟史[例(%)]       8.068 0.005
51(50.50) 34(43.04) 17(77.27)    
50(49.50) 45(56.96) 5(22.73)    
高血压[例(%)]       <0.001 0.976
64(63.37) 50(63.29) 14(63.64)    
37(36.63) 29(36.71) 8(36.36)    
糖尿病[例(%)]       2.752 0.097
92(91.09) 70(88.61) 22(100.00)    
9(8.91) 9(11.39) 0(0.00)    
心肺疾病[例(%)]       0.493 0.482
82(81.19) 63 (79.75) 19(86.36)    
19(18.81) 16 (20.25) 3(13.64)    
脑血管疾病[例(%)]       0.218 0.64
90(89.11) 71(89.87) 19(86.36)    
11(10.89) 8(10.13) 3(13.64)    
下腹部手术史[例(%)]       0.247 0.619
86(85.15) 68(86.08) 18(81.82)    
15(14.85) 11(13.92) 4(18.18)    
BMI(kg/m2,x±s) 22.15±3.01 22.17±3.02 22.06±3.05 0.023 0.879
患病时间[个月,M(Q1,Q3)] 36.00(1.00,96.00) 48.00(5.50,108.00) 0.46(0.10,51.00) 7.686 0.006
嵌顿时间[h,M(Q1,Q3)] 20.00(6.00,48.00) 18.00(6.00,24.00) 36.00(9.00,66.00) 2.521 0.112
疝环直径[cm,M(Q1,Q3)] 3.00(2.00,3.00) 3.00(3.00,3.00) 2.00(1.50,3.00) 6.427 0.011
腹腔积液[ml,M(Q1,Q3)] 1.00(1.00,150.00) 1.00(1.00,125.00) 100.00(1.00,287.50) 6.459 0.011
白细胞计数[M(Q1,Q3)] 9.20(7.00,11.37) 9.09(6.91,10.99) 10.00(7.96,13.17) 1.493 0.222
CRP[mg/L,M(Q1,Q3)] 1.58(0.10,11.66) 0.95(0.10,4.53) 29.24(6.79,39.39) 21.782 <0.001
肠梗阻[例(%)]       14.769 <0.001
63(62.38) 57(72.15) 6(27.27)    
38(37.62) 22(27.85) 16(72.73)    
疝的大小[例(%)]       30.160 <0.001
[0,5) cm 18(17.82) 10(12.66) 8(36.36)    
[5,10) cm 56(55.45) 49(62.03) 7(31.82)    
[10,15) cm 17(16.83) 17(21.52) 0(0.00)    
[15,20) cm 6(5.94) 3(3.80) 3(13.64)    
[20,25) cm 4(3.96) 0(0.00) 4(18.18)    
疝囊有无压痛[例(%)]       0.640 0.800
80(79.2) 63(79.7) 17(77.3)    
21(20.8) 16(20.3) 5(22.7)    
疝的类型[例(%)]       4.363 0.113
斜疝 72(71.29) 58(73.42) 14(63.64)    
直疝 11(10.89) 10(12.66) 1(4.55)    
股疝 18(17.82) 11(13.92) 7(31.82)    
还纳方式       101 0.413
术前还纳 38(37.62) 38(48.10) 0(0.00)    
术中腔镜还纳 41(40.59) 41(51.90) 0(0.00)    
中转开腹 9(8.91) 0(0.00) 9(40.91)    
切除坏死肠管 13(12.87) 0(0.00) 13(59.09)    
表2 TAPP治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝中转开腹多因素分析
图1 中转开腹相关危险因素的预测模型注:图1A为以单因素分析中的危险因素绘成列线图模型,单独取值并进行求和,总和用于预测嵌顿性腹股沟疝中转开腹的发生概率;图1B为利用ROC曲线来判断该预测模型对嵌顿性腹股沟疝中转开腹的敏感性及特异性;图1C为预测该模型的校准曲线,曲线越接近对称线,预测准确率越高。
[1]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组, 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 陈双, 等. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(3): 409-417.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(7): 645-648.
[3]
Venara A, Hubner M, Le Naoures P, et al. Surgery for incarcerated hernia: short-term outcome with or without mesh[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2014, 399(5): 571-577.
[4]
唐健雄, 郑民华, 李健文, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝腹腔镜诊治流程中国专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(7): 721-729.
[5]
De Simone B, Birindelli A, Ansaloni L, et al. Emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias: WSES guidelines[J]. Hernia, 2020, 24(2): 359-368.
[6]
Pavlosky KK, Vossler JD, Murayama SM, et al. Predictors of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(8): 2612-2619.
[7]
唐健雄, 李绍春. 特殊情况腹股沟疝外科治疗现状及展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 646-649.
[8]
Bessa SS, Abdel-fattah MR, Al-Sayes IA, et al. Results of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernias: a 10-year study[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(6): 909-914.
[9]
Salvilla SA, Thusu S, Panesar SS. Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: a meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2012, 8(4): 111-117.
[10]
Tulin A, Slavu I, Braga V, et al. TAAP vs. TEP in inguinal hernia repair-what is the evidence? A single center experience[J]. Chirurgia(Bucur), 2019, 114(1): 67-72.
[11]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management [J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[12]
徐周纬, 丁柏成, 王凯强, 等. 老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝的微创治疗及手术损伤控制策略[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2024, 27(8): 622-626.
[13]
Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 151-163.
[14]
Pawlak M, East B, de Beaux AC. Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction. Taxis, the technique and its safety[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(5): 1253-1258.
[15]
Zhang C, Wang R, Lv G, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy with incarcerated bowel retraction using "hernia sac injection impact technology" : video presentation[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(1): 645-646.
[16]
连彦军, 薛志广, 宋炳辉, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术联合腹壁小切口"杂交手术"治疗大网膜嵌顿腹股沟疝的临床体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(6): 452-455.
[17]
连彦军, 薛志广, 宋炳辉, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术联合腹壁小切口"杂交手术"治疗大网膜嵌顿腹股沟疝的临床体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(6): 452-455.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 23-23.
[3] 张翊乔, 李梦伊, 刘洋, 张鹏, 张忠涛. 我国腹腔镜减重代谢手术治疗现状与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-4.
[4] 刘慧, 袁野. 右侧前入路与左侧后入路腹腔镜根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 14-17.
[5] 康星, 俞杭, 单晓东, 孙喜太, 褚薛慧. 单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术围手术期血液管理措施的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 18-21.
[6] 王博申, 陈超武, 刘祺. 头侧-尾侧-中间入路腹腔镜全系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 26-29.
[7] 张升涛, 丁敬健, 刘洋, 郭永锋, 祁亚斌, 李亚俊. 回字型右下入路与常规中间入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 30-33.
[8] 沈振, 周岩. 中间尾侧联合入路腹腔镜系膜切除对右半结肠癌并肠梗阻患者炎症与应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 34-37.
[9] 许舜, 汪瀚, 胡涛, 钱梦佳, 崔一尧, 陈信浩. 两种术式治疗胆总管中下段结石合并急性胆管炎患者疗效及预后比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 38-41.
[10] 吴鹏, 许维, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 脾静脉近端结扎在腹腔镜脾切除术后预防门静脉血栓形成的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 59-62.
[11] 李瑞, 陈文浩, 徐镇, 蒋维荣, 李志文, 侯以森, 孟勇. 3D打印解剖模型联合腹腔镜手术视频在腹腔镜肝切除术临床教学的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 63-66.
[12] 魏平, 赵鑫, 田广健. 腹腔镜下置入IPST专用疝补片并开放原位造口重建治疗造口旁疝疗效分析(附52例报告)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 67-70.
[13] 李志军, 李宏伟, 吕瑞昌, 黄勇, 尚培中, 李晓武. 腹腔镜脾部分切除治疗脾脏硬化性血管瘤样结节性转化一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 75-77.
[14] 李晓英, 金芳, 张润萍, 陈晓丽, 庞粉萍, 翟佳琪, 王兰, 尚培中. 3D腹腔镜切除Hartmann术后远端残留直肠再发癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 99-100.
[15] 刘宝, 苏晓晨, 李广飞, 胥明婧. 超声引导下经皮肝穿刺胆囊引流对急性胆囊炎患者肝功能、胃肠道功能恢复及血清炎症指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 73-78.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?