切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 302 -306. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.03.013

论著

经腹腹膜前与完全腹膜外疝修补术对腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效
肖家全1, 张勇1,(), 严伟2   
  1. 1. 243000 安徽省马鞍山市人民医院胃肠外科
    2. 237000 安徽医科大学附属六安医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-26 出版日期:2024-06-18
  • 通信作者: 张勇
  • 基金资助:
    安徽医科大学临床科学基金项目(2022xkj240)

Study on clinical effect of transabdominal preperitoneal and total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Jiaquan Xiao1, Yong Zhang1,(), Wei Yan2   

  1. 1. Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Maanshan People's Hospital, Maanshan City 243000, Anhui Province, China
    2. Department of Oncology, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an City 237000, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2023-10-26 Published:2024-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Yong Zhang
引用本文:

肖家全, 张勇, 严伟. 经腹腹膜前与完全腹膜外疝修补术对腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 302-306.

Jiaquan Xiao, Yong Zhang, Wei Yan. Study on clinical effect of transabdominal preperitoneal and total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 302-306.

目的

比较经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对成人腹股沟斜疝的治疗效果。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究方法,选取2021年1月至2022年1月于安徽省马鞍山市人民医院行TAPP、TEP治疗的154例患者数据进行倾向性匹配评分,纳入2组间基线差异无统计学意义的患者,根据纳入排除标准最终纳入61例腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料,根据手术方法的不同将其分为TAPP组(31例)及TEP组(30例)。统计2组手术相关指标及术后疼痛程度、胃肠功能恢复情况、血清肿发生情况、并发症发生率、术后1年疝复发率。

结果

2组患者手术成功率均为100%。TEP组手术时间短于TAPP组,术中出血量少于TAPP组(t=3.942、4.964,P均<0.001)。TEP组术后1、2 d的视觉模拟评分低于TAPP组(t=2.677、P=0.010,t=2.294、P=0.025)。TEP组肠鸣音恢复时间、首次肛门排气时间、首次进食时间及初次排便时间短于TAPP组(t=2.316、P=0.024,t=2.684、P<0.01,t=5.281、P<0.001,t=3.654、P=0.001)。2组患者血清肿发生情况及并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.612、P=0.434,χ2=0.223、P=0.367)。TAPP组、TEP组术后1年疝复发率分别为6.45%(2/31)、3.33%(1/30),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.317,P>0.05)。

结论

TEP治疗成人腹股沟斜疝较TAPP手术时间更短、术中出血更少、创伤更小,且可改善胃肠功能,但两种术式对术后复发的影响不大。

Objective

To compare the therapeutic effect of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the treatment of indirect inguinal hernia in adults.

Methods

Adopting retrospective cohort study, data of 154 patients who received TAPP and TEP treatment in Maanshan People's Hospital, Anhui Province from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected for propensity matching score. Patients with no statistically significant baseline differences in both groups were included, and clinical data of 61 patients with indirect inguinal hernia were finally enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into TAPP group (31 cases) and TEP group (30 cases). The surgery-related indicators, postoperative pain degree, gastrointestinal function recovery status, seroma occurrence, incidence rates of complications and recurrence rate at 1 year after surgery were analyzed in the two groups.

Results

The success rate of surgery was 100% in both groups. The surgical time in TEP group was shorter than that in TAPP group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in TAPP group (t=3.942, 4.964, all P<0.001). The visual analogue scale scores in TEP group at 1 and 2 d after surgery were lower than those in TAPP group (t=2.677, P=0.010; t=2.294, P=0.025). The bowel sound recovery time, the first anal exhaust time, first feeding time, and first defecation time were shorter in TEP group than those in TAPP group (t=2.316, P=0.024; t=2.684, P<0.01; t=5.281, P<0.001; t=3.654, P=0.001). There were no statistical differences in occurrence of seroma and incidence rates of complications between the two groups (Z=0.612, P=0.434; χ2=0.223, P=0.367). The recurrence rates in TAPP group and TEP group at 1 year after surgery were 6.45% (2/31) and 3.33% (1/30) respectively, with no significant statistical differences (χ2=0.317, P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with TAPP, TEP has shorter surgical time, less intraoperative blood loss and less trauma in the treatment of adult indirect inguinal hernia, and it can improve the gastrointestinal function, but the two surgical methods have little effect on postoperative recurrence.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者术后疼痛视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者胃肠功能恢复情况比较(h,±s
表5 2组患者发生血清肿及Morales分型情况比较[例(%)]
表6 2组患者并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Xu TQ, Higgins RM. The Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia: Current Trends and Considerations[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2023, 103(5): 875-887.
[2]
Altin O, Kaya S. Comparison of Total Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal Hernia Repair between Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients[J]. Int J Gerontol, 2020, 14(2): 115-118.
[3]
Al-Sawat A, Alshalawi W, Lee J, et al. Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia under low gas pressure and spinal anesthesia: A video vignette[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(5): 1150-1151.
[4]
Coratti F, Nelli T, Maggioni C, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) for incarcerated femoral hernia-video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2020, 22(6): 723-723.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[6]
大中华腔镜疝外科学院, 中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 中华医学会外科分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2013, 18(10): 793-800.
[7]
严广斌. 视觉模拟评分法[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 273.
[8]
Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, et al. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1996, 77(2): 217-222.
[9]
刘雨辰, 王明刚. 成人腹股沟疝修补术特殊并发症研究进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 854-857.
[10]
王江, 阎大益, 彭微, 等. 腹股沟疝患儿腹腔镜经皮腹膜外闭合术后疝复发及对侧腹股沟疝发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2021, 31(11): 75-80.
[11]
吴崇才, 林鸿彪. PKURP术联合同期行TEP对老年前列腺增生合并腹股沟疝治疗的效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(13): 3152-3155.
[12]
胡宗云. 腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 264-266.
[13]
刘威, 沈根海, 高泉根, 等. 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与开放手术治疗女性腹股沟疝的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2023, 23(5): 354-358.
[14]
张敏剑, 吴永友, 钟丰云, 等. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人单侧初发腹股沟疝的效果比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(10): 84-87, 99.
[15]
唐建坡, 李岩, 张洪铭, 等. TAPP与TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果及对预后恢复的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(18): 3587-3590.
[16]
胡良鹤, 王贵和, 武其文. TEP、TAPP与开放疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2023, 29(4): 802-807.
[17]
王明镜, 黄鹤光, 林贤超, 等. 腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(1): 81-86.
[18]
吴立胜, 余建伟, 李煜. 复发腹股沟疝手术方式的选择及临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1043-1047.
[19]
黄翠景, 吴永丰, 刘兴洲. 无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床效果及安全性评价[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(4): 439-442.
[20]
田瑞雪, 邹永红. 三种成人腹股沟疝修补术手术并发症比较及其影响因素分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(9): 1385-1388.
[21]
牛斌, 仇明洋, 李强. 改良TEP、TAPP与Rutkow术式治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2021, 20(10): 1098-1101.
[22]
Hung TY, Wu CC, Chen LS, et al. Safety of two common laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy approaches: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2020, 9(5): 2007-2021.
[23]
Ortenzi M, Williams S, Solanki N, et al. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center[J]. Minerva Chir, 2020, 75(5): 279-285.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?