切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 427 -431. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.04.013

论著

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性股疝的临床研究
屠义梅, 陈嘉, 戚腾()   
  1. 225001 江苏,扬州大学附属苏北人民医院疝儿外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-08-18
  • 通信作者: 戚腾
  • 基金资助:
    扬州大学附属苏北人民医院第6批院级扶持技术项目(FCJS20214)

Clinical study on the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair

Yimei Tu, Jia Chen, Teng Qi()   

  1. Department of Hernia and Pediatric Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2022-11-28 Published:2023-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Teng Qi
引用本文:

屠义梅, 陈嘉, 戚腾. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性股疝的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 427-431.

Yimei Tu, Jia Chen, Teng Qi. Clinical study on the treatment of incarcerated femoral hernia by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 427-431.

目的

探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗嵌顿性股疝的临床疗效和技术难点。

方法

回顾扬州大学附属苏北人民医院2018年1月至2021年10月经TAPP治疗嵌顿性股疝患者24例的临床资料,统计分析患者的术中发现及处理方法,手术相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间),术后并发症(切口感染、浆液肿、补片感染等)及复发率。

结果

24例患者均完成TAPP治疗,完全腹腔镜下回纳疝内容物22例,有2例因初始经验不足,术中辅助小切口回纳嵌顿的疝内容物。11例患者发生小肠嵌顿,其中4例手法复位失败,术中电钩切开髂耻束回纳小肠,术中探查复位的嵌顿肠管无损伤或坏死。4例患者探查发现隐匿疝,3例行TAPP双侧股疝手术,另1例因患者90岁高龄,为减少麻醉时间及手术创伤,未同时行隐匿疝修补术。手术时间45~150 min,平均(84.87±26.10)min;术中出血量5~30 ml,平均(9.58±6.06)ml;住院时间2~15 d,平均(6.70±3.07)d。术后出现浆液肿1例,予穿刺抽液后好转;术后排尿困难1例,予留置导尿管2 d后好转。术后无切口感染。通过电话或患者来院复诊随访,随访时间3个月~2年,未发现补片感染和疝复发。

结论

嵌顿性股疝患者行TAPP治疗安全、有效,可减少二次手术率,术后并发症少。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy and technical challenges of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) in treating incarcerated femoral hernias.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients with incarcerated femoral hernia treated with TAPP at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University from January 2018 to October 2021. Clinical data that intraoperative findings and management methods, surgical-related indicators (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay), postoperative complications (wound infection, seroma formation, mesh infection), and recurrence rate, were analyzed.

Results

All 24 patients successfully underwent TAPP treatment. Of these, 22 patients had their hernia contents completely reduced laparoscopically, while 2 required an auxiliary small incision to reduce the incarcerated hernia contents due to initial inexperience. In 11 patients, there was an intestinal incarceration; out of which, 4 cases failed in manual reduction. During the procedure, the iliopubic tract was incised using an electrosurgical hook to reduce the small intestine. Subsequent examination revealed that the reduced incarcerated intestine had no damage or necrosis. During the exploratory procedure of 4 patients, a concealed hernia was discovered. Three of these patients underwent TAPP surgery for bilateral femoral hernias. One patient, aged 90, did not undergo simultaneous repair of the concealed hernia to reduce anesthesia time and surgical trauma. The surgery lasted between 45 to 150 minutes, averaging 84.87±26.10 minutes. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 5 to 30 ml, with an average of 9.58±6.06 ml. The hospital stay varied between 2 to 15 days, averaging 6.70±3.07 days. One patient developed postoperative seroma, which improved after aspiration. Another patient faced difficulties in urination postoperatively and showed improvement after a urinary catheter was retained for 2 days. There were no cases of wound infection. Through phone follow-ups or patient revisits, during a period ranging from 3 months to 2 years, no mesh infections or hernia recurrences were identified.

Conclusion

The TAPP treatment method for patients with incarcerated femoral hernia is safe and effective. This method can not only reduce the need for a second surgery, but also has fewer postoperative complications.

图4 松解股管口后,回纳疝囊及嵌顿的腹膜外脂肪。
[1]
朱雷, 唐文皓, 唐健雄. 成人腹股沟嵌顿疝和绞窄疝的急诊手术[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2016, 43(10): 712-715.
[2]
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 343-403.
[3]
陈继安, 靳小健, 陈永军, 等. 成人腹股沟嵌顿疝治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 249-251.
[4]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[5]
Andresen K, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, et al. Reoperation rates for laparoscopic vs open repair of femoral hernias in Denmark: a nationwide analysis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2014, 149(8): 853-857.
[6]
Siddaiah-Subramanya M, Ashrafi D, Memon B, et al. Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 975-986.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[8]
Shakil A, Aparicio K, Barta E, et al. Inguinal Hernias: Diagnosis and Management[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2020, 102(8): 487-492.
[9]
刘石龙, 杨加磊, 逯景辉. 腹腔镜时代老年腹股沟疝的治疗策略[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(30): 206-209.
[10]
Halgas B, Viera J, Dilday J, et al. Femoral Hernias: Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors and 30-Day Outcomes of Initial Groin Hernias Using ACS-NSQIP[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(9): 1455-1461.
[11]
Okazaki R, Poudel S, Hane Y, et al. Laparoscopic approach as a safe and effective option for incarcerated femoral hernias[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2022, 15(2): 328-334.
[12]
江志鹏, 侯泽辉, 刘伟, 等. "空气置换法"在腹腔镜腹股沟嵌顿疝手术中的应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(10): 735-738.
[13]
范国勇, 姚干. 腹腔镜下腔隙韧带切开治疗嵌顿股疝的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 22-26.
[14]
李征威, 张玉新, 王磊. 成人腹股沟嵌顿疝发生肠坏死的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 433-437.
[15]
陈福强, 赵凤林, 陈杰, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术中使用补片材料的经验[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2019, 34(5): 406-409.
[16]
Liu J, Zhai Z, Chen J. The Use of Prosthetic Mesh in the Emergency Management of Acute Incarcerated Inguinal Hernias[J]. Surg Innov, 2019, 26(3): 344-349.
[17]
Pandey H, Thakur DS, Somashekar U, et al. Use of polypropylene mesh in contaminated and dirty strangulated hernias: short-term results[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(6): 1045-1050.
[18]
Liu J, Chen J, Shen Y. The results of open preperitoneal prosthetic mesh repair for acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia: a retrospective study of 146 cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(1): 47-52.
[19]
Zhao F, Liu M, Chen J, et al. Clinical effects of prosthetic mesh in the treatment of incarcerated groin hernias[J]. Minerva Chir, 2019, 74(6): 458-464.
[20]
张万宇, 孙海燕, 黎东伟. 经腹直肌腹膜前无张力修补手术治疗嵌顿性股疝24例[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 509-511.
[21]
Dhanani NH, Olavarria OA, Wootton S, et al. Contralateral exploration and repair of occult inguinal hernias during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and Markov decision process[J]. BJS Open, 2021, 5(2): zraa020.
[22]
王中魁, 孙惠军, 孟祥朝. 成人隐匿性腹股沟疝的诊疗进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(7): 648-651.
[23]
李梦奇, 魏九峰, 陈洪生. 隐匿性腹股沟疝的诊断及治疗进展[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2021, 48(4): 283-288.
[24]
Malouf PA, Descallar J, Berney CR. Bilateral totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of the ultrasound-diagnosed asymptomatic contralateral inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2): 955-962.
[25]
Park JB, Chong DC, Reid JL, et al. Should asymptomatic contralateral inguinal hernia be laparoscopically repaired in the adult population as benefits greatly outweigh risks? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(4): 999-1007.
[26]
Jarrard JA, Arroyo MR, Moore BT. Occult contralateral inguinal hernias: what is their true incidence and should they be repaired?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(8): 2456-2458.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[12] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[13] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要