切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 87 -90. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.01.021

临床论著

高低频彩超双体位扫查诊断腹股沟疝对比并影像特征分析
洪珊珊1,(), 王礼才1   
  1. 1. 231500 合肥,庐江县人民医院超声诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-03 出版日期:2023-02-18
  • 通信作者: 洪珊珊
  • 基金资助:
    合肥市卫健委应用医学研究重点项目(hwk2021zd022)

Comparison of color high- and low-frequency probe combined with dual position scanning in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia and analysis of imaging characteristics

Shanshan Hong1,(), Licai Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Lujiang County People's Hospital, Hefei 231500, Anhui, China
  • Received:2022-06-03 Published:2023-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Shanshan Hong
引用本文:

洪珊珊, 王礼才. 高低频彩超双体位扫查诊断腹股沟疝对比并影像特征分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 87-90.

Shanshan Hong, Licai Wang. Comparison of color high- and low-frequency probe combined with dual position scanning in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia and analysis of imaging characteristics[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 87-90.

目的

探讨彩超高频探头双体位扫查在腹股沟疝诊断中的作用,并对该类病变的影像学特征进行分析。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年1月在庐江县人民医院普外科接受腹股沟疝手术治疗的90例患者的资料。依据彩超诊断方法分组,42例低频探头联合双体位扫查者为对照组,48例高频探头联合双体位扫查者为观察组。描述2组患者的手术结果分布情况。以患者的手术结果作为金标准,分析2组患者的腹股沟疝及其合并症的诊断准确率。描述腹股沟疝的超声声像图特征。

结果

2组患者的手术结果显示,共有直疝20例,斜疝52例,斜疝合并直疝14例,股疝4例,2组的腹股沟疝分布情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组腹股沟疝整体诊断准确率高于对照组(P<0.05),在各类腹股沟疝中,观察组斜疝诊断准确率高于对照组(P<0.05),2组直疝、斜疝合并直疝、股疝的诊断准确率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组腹股沟疝合并症的整体诊断准确率高于对照组(P<0.05),2组患者单纯性腹股沟疝、合并精索脂肪瘤、合并鞘膜积液的诊断准确率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹股沟疝应用高频彩超和低频彩超配合不同体位扫描,均可取得良好的检测效果,而高频彩超对腹股沟疝及其各类合并症的诊断准确性更好,临床可依据现实情况选择使用。

Objective

To explore the role of color high-frequency probe combined with dual position scanning in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia, and to analyze the imaging characteristics of such lesions.

Methods

The data of 90 patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery in the Department of General Surgery of Lujiang County People's Hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different color ultrasound diagnosis methods, the patients were divided into two groups: 42 patients with low-frequency probe combined with dual position scanning as the control group, and 48 patients with high-frequency probe combined with dual position scanning as the observation group. The distribution of surgical results in the 2 groups was described. With the surgical results of the patients as the gold standard, the diagnostic accuracy of inguinal hernia and complications of the two groups was analyzed. The ultrasonographic features of inguinal hernia were described.

Results

The surgical results of the two groups showed that there were 20 cases of direct hernia, 52 cases of indirect hernia, 14 cases of indirect hernia combined with direct hernia, and 4 cases of femoral hernia. There was no statistical difference in the distribution of inguinal hernia between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall diagnostic accuracy in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). In the classification of various inguinal hernias, the diagnostic accuracy of indirect hernia in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of direct hernia, indirect hernia combined with direct hernia, and femoral hernia between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall diagnostic accuracy of inguinal hernia complications in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the diagnostic accuracy of simple inguinal hernia, combined with spermatic lipoma and combined with hydrocele between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Both high-frequency color ultrasound and low-frequency color ultrasound combined with different body scanning position can achieve good detection results for inguinal hernia. High-frequency color ultrasound is more accurate in diagnosing inguinal hernia and its complications. It can be selected according to the actual situation in clinical practice.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患者手术结果分布情况[例(%)]
表3 2组患者腹股沟疝诊断准确率比较[%(超声/手术)]
表4 2组患者腹股沟疝合并症的诊断准确率比较[%(超声/手术)]
[1]
马先, 贺杰, 马俊帅. 丹红注射液结合抗菌药物对腹股沟疝术后血清MMP-2、MMP-9、TIMP-2、TIMP-1及应激指标作用机制研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2019, 14(9): 2404-2407.
[2]
Tebala GD, Kola-Adejumo A, Yee J. Hernioscopy: a reliable method to explore the abdominal cavity in incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias spontaneously reduced after general anaesthesia[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(2): 403-406.
[3]
张文芳. 超声隐匿性腹股沟疝诊断中影像学特点分析及应用[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2021, 5(5): 37-38, 41.
[4]
丰波, 黄巧燕, 罗晴霞, 等. 腹部超声检查在不同类型腹股沟疝中的诊断效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 678-681.
[5]
陈昕, 杨恒颖, 徐露, 等. 急诊腹股沟疝的诊断与治疗分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(7): 799-804.
[6]
罗培生, 邢开宇, 江桂琼, 等. 超声检测疝口在腹股沟疝鉴别诊断中的价值探讨[J]. 吉林医学, 2020, 41(8): 1838-1839.
[7]
赵连奎. 高频彩色多普勒超声诊断腹股沟斜疝的价值分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2020, 24(17): 2452-2453.
[8]
李争卫, 何爱萍, 赵玲, 等. 超声引导下连续IINB在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果及对患者术后镇痛和恢复的影响[J]. 医学综述, 2022, 28(8): 1660-1664.
[9]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[10]
曹羽, 龚航军, 韩刚, 等. 单侧腹股沟斜疝完全剥离疝囊术和横断疝囊术治疗的效果观察[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2022, 27(4): 497-500.
[11]
陈海伟,陆雄,樊林,等.3D补片预选择在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2022,27(5):371-374.
[12]
杨涛. 腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟斜疝的临床效果[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2022, 28(1): 130-131.
[13]
梁永辉, 磨鹏诗, 廖伟明, 等. 腹腔镜下修补术与开放式无张力修补术在老年腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 34-37.
[14]
曹廷宝, 杜雪龙, 于建平, 等. 局麻下行李金斯坦疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 425-427.
[15]
张斌, 侯海金, 闫慧明. ProGrip型与UHS型补片在相应术式下治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 436-439.
[16]
任清付, 何雪妮. 局麻下开放腹膜前复发性腹股沟疝修补术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 447-449.
[17]
黎金娣, 吴彩云. 彩色超声多普勒在腹股沟疝诊断中的应用[J]. 影像技术, 2022, 34(2): 68-71.
[18]
路爱华. 彩色多普勒超声对小儿腹股沟疝的诊断价值[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2021, 13(6): 124-127.
[19]
韩文静,陈舒婷,曹剑标. 彩超高频探头双体位扫查在腹股沟疝诊断中的作用及影像学特征分析[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(2): 162-165.
[20]
梅陈, 丁杰, 江峰. 超声检查在成人腹股沟斜疝合并隐睾嵌顿的应用1例[J]. 承德医学院学报, 2021, 38(6): 526-527.
[21]
张莉. 高频超声在腹股沟斜疝临床诊断中应用的准确性分析[J].影像研究与医学应用,2022,6(15): 116-118.
[22]
林湃,林雁朝,黄泽嫦.彩色多普勒超声检查中联合高低频探头、双体位扫查对腹股沟疝诊断准确性的影响[J/OL].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021,15(4): 372-374.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[3] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[4] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[5] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[6] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[7] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[8] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[9] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[10] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[11] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要