切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 90 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.01.021

临床论著

腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗阴囊疝的临床疗效
钱利强1, 周荷妹2, 王刚1, 苏浩渊1, 李斌2,()   
  1. 1. 215200 苏州市第九人民医院肝胆外科
    2. 215200 苏州市第九人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-25 出版日期:2022-02-18
  • 通信作者: 李斌

Effect of scrotal hernia treated by laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair

Liqiang Qian1, Hemei Zhou2, Gang Wang1, Haoyuan Su1, Bin Li2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, SuZhou Ninth People's Hospital, SuZhou 215200, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, SuZhou Ninth People's Hospital, SuZhou 215200, China
  • Received:2020-09-25 Published:2022-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Bin Li
引用本文:

钱利强, 周荷妹, 王刚, 苏浩渊, 李斌. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗阴囊疝的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 90-92.

Liqiang Qian, Hemei Zhou, Gang Wang, Haoyuan Su, Bin Li. Effect of scrotal hernia treated by laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 90-92.

目的

探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)中两种不同方式处理阴囊疝疝囊的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年12月苏州市第九人民医院行完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗阴囊疝65例患者的病例资料。按术中疝囊处理方式不同分为A组(35例)和B组(30例)。A组患者疝囊横断,B组患者疝囊完全剥离。比较2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间及相关并发症发生情况。

结果

A组手术时间、总并发症发生率均优于B组(P<0.05);2组患者术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访6~24个月,2组均未复发。

结论

采用TEP术治疗阴囊疝安全有效,且可行。TEP术中采用疝囊横断或疝囊剥离对术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率无影响,可根据患者的实际情况适合选择。疝囊横断手术难度相对较低,手术时间短,术后并发症少,更适合基层医院开展。

Objective

To investigate the safety and clinical effect of two different methods of transecting or stripping the hernia sac of scrotal hernia in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.

Methods

65 patients with scrotal hernia who underwent TEP from January 2017 to December 2019 in Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, they were divided into group A (n=35) and group B (n=30) according to different treatment methods of the hernia sac. In group A, the hernia sac was transected, and in group B, the hernia sac was stripped. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and related complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time and total complication rate of group A were better than group B (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients of the two groups were followed up for 6 to 24 months, and there was no recurrence in both groups.

Conclusion

Scrotal hernia treated by TEP is safe, effective and feasible. Transecting or stripping the hernia sac during TEP has no effect on the amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and incidence of postoperative complications, which can be selected according to the actual situation of patients. Transecting sac of scrotal hernia is relatively easier, which can reduce the operation time and complications. It is more suitable for the primary hospitals.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较(±s
表2 2组患者临床指标比较(±s
[1]
张云,陈鑫,李健文, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术2056例报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 19(6): 462-466.
[2]
Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic(TAPP) and endoscopic(TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia(International Endohernia Society)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(2): 289-321.
[3]
周建平,任峰. 成人腹股沟疝修补术原理再认识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1209-1211.
[4]
Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic(TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society(IEHS)][J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(9): 2773-2843.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2013, 33(7): 566-570.
[6]
储修峰,郭绍红. 英国国家临床技术研究院腹腔镜疝修补术技术指南[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2007, 7(12): 1132-1134.
[7]
司仙科,李炜,杨桂华, 等. 负压引流在腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术后减少血清肿的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 30-33.
[8]
王平. 腹腔镜腹部疝修补术后血清肿分型的解读[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(2): 107-108.
[9]
Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan BH, et al. Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(2): 325-328.
[10]
Lau H, Lee F. Seroma following endoscopic extraperitonealinguinal hernioplasty[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(11): 1773-1777.
[11]
李俊生,邵翔宇,程韬, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后浆液肿的预防措施[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 12-15.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?