切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 8 -11. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.01.003

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜下生物补片修补成人脐疝的临床疗效分析
李光兴1, 申英末2,()   
  1. 1. 100043 北京,首都医科大学第三临床医学院
    2. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-10 出版日期:2021-02-18
  • 通信作者: 申英末

Analysis of clinical effect of laparoscopic biological mesh repair for adult umbilical hernia

Guangxing Li1, Yingmo Shen2,()   

  1. 1. The Third Clinical Medical College of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
    2. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2020-01-10 Published:2021-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Yingmo Shen
引用本文:

李光兴, 申英末. 腹腔镜下生物补片修补成人脐疝的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 8-11.

Guangxing Li, Yingmo Shen. Analysis of clinical effect of laparoscopic biological mesh repair for adult umbilical hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 8-11.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下生物补片修补成人脐疝的有效性和临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年1月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科15例行腹腔镜脐疝生物补片修补术患者的临床资料。

结果

15例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜脐疝修补术,所有患者均行腹腔内生物补片置入修补术。住院时间5~6 d,平均5.5 d。术后随访8~32个月,平均18个月。随访期间无复发,发生包裹性积液1例;术后1个月发生血清肿3例;未见术后发生腹壁慢性疼痛。

结论

腹腔镜下生物补片修补成人脐疝是一种微创、安全、可靠的方法,并且具有较好的临床效果。

Objective

To explore the effectiveness and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic biological mesh repair for adult umbilical hernia.

Methods

The clinical data of 15 patients undergoing laparoscopic umbilical hernia biological mesh repair from January 2017 to January 2019 in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh were performed in all 15 patients successfully. The hospitalization was 5 to 6 days, with an average of 5.5 days. The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 42 months, with an average of 18 months. There was no recurrence during follow-up; 1 case of encapsulated effusion occurred; 3 cases of seroma occurred at 1 month after surgery; no chronic pain occurred in the area of abdominal wall after surgery.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic biological mesh repair of adult umbilical hernia is a minimally invasive, safe and reliable method, and it has good clinical effect.

[1]
刘彤,陈志雨. 成人脐疝无张力修补18例分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2006, 26(4): 297.
[2]
Sharma A, Mehrotra M, Khullar R, et al. Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: a single centre experience of 1 242 patients over a period of 13 years[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(2): 131-139.
[3]
Köckerling F, Lammers B. Open intraperitoneal onlay mesh(IPOM) technique for incisional hernia repair[J]. Front Surg, 2018, 5: 66.
[4]
Carbajo M A, Olmo JCMND, Blanco JI, et al. Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(1): 118-122.
[5]
Zhang J, Wang GY, Xiao YP, et al. The biomechanical behavior and host response to porcine-derived small intestine submucosa, pericardium and dermal matrix acellular grafts in a rat abdominal defect model[J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(29): 7086-7095.
[6]
陈松耀,戴伟钢,陈创奇. 生物补片在疝与腹壁外科的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 90-93.
[7]
孙力波,张海涛,赵晓飞, 等. 脐疝合并肝硬化腹水患者修补术治疗体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(4): 244-246.
[8]
刘飞德,李基业,姚胜. 腹腔镜下生物补片修补成人脐疝[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2009, 24(11): 868-870.
[9]
梁庆余,谢佳明,吴浩荣, 等. 腹腔镜下成人脐疝修补术26例疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 6(4): 279-283.
[10]
Colavita PD, Belyansky I, Walters AL, et al. Umbilical hernia repair with mesh: identifying effectors of ideal outcomes[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 208(3): 342-349.
[11]
Aslani N, Brown CJ. Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2010, 14(5): 455-462.
[12]
Lee L, Mata J, Landry T, et al. A systematic review of synthetic and biologic materials for abdominal wall reinforcement in contaminated fields[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9): 2531-2546.
[13]
Giordano P, Pullan R D, Ystgaard B, et al. The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2015, 19(7): 411-417.
[14]
Sanchez VM, Abi-Haidar YE, Itani KMF. Mesh infection in ventral incisional hernia repair: incidence, contributing factors, and treatment[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt), 2011, 12(3): 205-210.
[15]
戴伟钢,陈志辉,谭进富, 等. 猪小肠黏膜下层脱细胞基质补片与聚丙烯补片应用于前腹壁切口疝修补术的疗效分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1095-1100.
[16]
樊知遥,张光永,闫治波. 腹腔镜切口疝修补术的现状及研究进展[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(2): 151-157.
[17]
Kaoutzanis C, Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, et al. Risk factors for postoperative wound infections and prolonged hospitalization after ventral/incisional hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(1): 113-123.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[13] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[14] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[15] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要