切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 613 -617. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.06.007

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

成人腹股沟复发疝行腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙修补术疗效分析
贾高磊1, 刘岩1,(), 田志龙1, 高新宝1, 袁福康1, 奚海林1   
  1. 1. 221006 徐州市中心医院血甲疝微创外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-12 出版日期:2020-12-20
  • 通信作者: 刘岩

Efficacy analysis of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia in adults

Gaolei Jia1, Yan Liu1,(), Zhilong Tian1, Xinbao Gao1, Fukang Yuan1, Hailin Xi1   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular &Thyroid &Hernia Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2020-01-12 Published:2020-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Yan Liu
引用本文:

贾高磊, 刘岩, 田志龙, 高新宝, 袁福康, 奚海林. 成人腹股沟复发疝行腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙修补术疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 613-617.

Gaolei Jia, Yan Liu, Zhilong Tian, Xinbao Gao, Fukang Yuan, Hailin Xi. Efficacy analysis of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia in adults[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 613-617.

目的

探讨并分析腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙疝修补术(TAPP)治疗成人腹股沟复发疝的临床效果及手术技巧。

方法

回顾性分析2016年5月至2019年4月于徐州市中心医院血甲疝微创外科行TAPP手术的52例复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。统计并分析患者手术时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生情况等数据。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放。手术用时35~110 min,平均(61.7±13.8)min;术中出血量5~40 ml,平均(13.1±4.7)ml;术后住院时间为1~7 d,平均(2.5±0.9)d;术中误伤腹壁下血管者1例(1.9%),经缝扎止血后好转。术后出现阴囊血清肿者5例(9.6%),3例经保守治疗后治愈,2例经穿刺抽吸后治愈。阴囊及腹股沟区气肿者2例,自行吸收好转。尿潴留者3例(5.8%),经留置导尿管2 d过渡后恢复自行排尿。术区异物感者2例(3.8%),经口服神经营养及止痛药后好转。术后随访6~41个月,无再次复发、补片感染、持续性疼痛、肠梗阻等严重并发症发生。

结论

TAPP治疗成人腹股沟复发疝具有疗效确切、安全性高、术后恢复好、复发率低的优势,但要求术者必须在熟练掌握腹腔镜技巧、腹股沟区解剖及复发疝的治疗要点的前提下,才能充分发挥TAPP的优势,取得临床最佳疗效。

Objective

To explore and analysis the surgical techniques and the effect of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in adults.

Methods

The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent laparoscopic TAPP for the recurrent inguinal hernia in Xuzhou Central hospital from May 2016 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, hospitalization time and postoperative complications and other data were statistically were analyzed.

Results

All patients were completed successfully by TAPP and no one was converted to open surgery. The operation time was 35 to 110 min, and the mean operation time was (61.7±13.8) minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 5 to 40 ml, and the mean blood loss was (13.1±4.7) ml. The postoperative hospital stay was 1 to 7 days, and the mean length of hospital stay was (2.5±0.9) days. One case (1.9%) of inferior epigastric vessel was injured during the operation. There were 5 patients (9.6%) with scrotal seroma after operation, 2 patients were cured after puncture and drainage and 3 patients were cured after conservative symptomatic treatment. Two cases of emphysema in the scrotum and groin area were self-absorbed after operation without treatment. Three cases of urinary retention (5.8%) had indwelling catheter after operation, and the catheter was removed in 2 days. There were 2 cases (3.8%) of foreign body sensation in the operation area, which improved after oral nutrition and analgesics. All patients were followed up for 6to 41 months, there were no serious complications such as recurrence, mesh infection, persistent pain, intestinal obstruction after operation.

Conclusions

TAPP for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia in adults has the advantages of definite curative effect, high safety, fast postoperative recovery and low recurrence rate. But at the same time, the surgeon can only fully utilize the advantages of TAPP and obtain the best clinical effect under the premise of proficient in laparoscopic skills, anatomy of the inguinal area, and treatment points of recurrent hernia.

[1]
王明刚. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片植入术治疗复发性腹股沟疝技术探讨[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(11): 1172-1174.
[2]
陈亚柯,陈建民,王殿琛, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与前入路手术治疗充填式无张力修补术后复发疝的对比研究[J]. 中国临床实用医学, 2019, 10(5): 55-57.
[3]
Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A, et al. Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(3): 355-66.
[4]
Köckerling F, Koch A, Lorenz R, et al. Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up[J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(4): 813-25.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科组. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(10): 833-835.
[6]
Magnusson N, Nordin P, Hedberg M, et al. 腹股沟疝复发的时间分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2011, 31(4): 336-340.
[7]
KÄckerling F, Jacob D, Wiegank W, et al. Endoscopic repair of primary versus recurrent male unilateral inguinal hernias: Are there differences in the outcome?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(3): 1146-1155.
[8]
Burcharth J. The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Dan Med J, 2014, 61(5): B4846.
[9]
Zhong C, Wu B, Yang Z, et al. A meta analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Innov, 2013, 20(1): 24-31.
[10]
何举,王志义,赵立仙. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝与腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13,(3): 251-253.
[11]
International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[12]
吴立胜,余建伟,李煜. 复发腹股沟疝手术方式的选择及临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1043-1047.
[13]
林洋,穆林松,隋武, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对比研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(3): 253-255.
[14]
费昱达,曾玉剑,孙亮, 等. 全腹膜外与经腹膜腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗网塞型补片修补术后复发的体会[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(2): 255-256, 264.
[15]
王明刚,申英末,陈杰, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补技术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(20): 1588-1590.
[16]
黄俊,蔡小勇,靳小建, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝再次腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的经验[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 210-212.
[17]
梁骁. 腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝疗效分析[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2018, 39(1): 18-20.
[18]
Mayer F, Niebuhr H, Lechner M, et al. When Is mesh fixation in TAPP-repair of primary inguinal hernia repair necessary? The Register-Based Analysis of 11230 Cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(10): 4363-71.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?