切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 189 -192. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.023

所属专题: 文献

护理论著

术前干预对造口旁疝手术患者的影响
李建君1,()   
  1. 1. 638500 四川省广安市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-01 出版日期:2020-04-18
  • 通信作者: 李建君

Effect of before operation intervention on patients with parastomal hernia surgery

Jianjun Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Guang'an People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Sichuan, Guang’an 638500, China
  • Received:2019-12-01 Published:2020-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jianjun Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Jianjun, Email:
引用本文:

李建君. 术前干预对造口旁疝手术患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 189-192.

Jianjun Li. Effect of before operation intervention on patients with parastomal hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 189-192.

目的

探讨术前干预对造口旁疝手术患者的影响。

方法

选取2018年6月至2019年4月在四川省广安市人民医院普外科行造口旁疝手术的42例患者作为观察对象,其中,男性23例,女性19例。患者平均年龄为38.5岁。按照随机数表法随机分为干预组和对照组,每组21例。对照组患者进行常规的术前检查、术中及术后护理。干预组患者在常规护理的基础上给予术前、术中及术后积极的心理疏导。记录2组患者的心率、血压等生命体征指标;使用Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)测量患者的焦虑指数。

结果

干预组患者入手术室麻醉前及气管导管拔出时的血压均较对照组稳定[(116.25±8.79)mmHg vs(129.17± 7.65)mmHg,(121.35±15.30)mmHg vs (126.17±10.85)mmHg],差异有统计学意义(t=5.24、8.173,P<0.05)。干预组在入手术室麻醉前及导管拔出时的心率较对照组稳定[(71.23±7.26)次/min vs (80.26±7.63)次/min,(77.39±5.63)次/min vs (85.26±11.69)次/min],差异有统计学意义(t=6.358、8.241,P<0.05)。麻醉前及术后3 d干预组SAS评分低于对照组[(42.63±76.69)分vs (48.26±6.62)分,(43.16±6.32)分vs(46.28±5.32)分],差异有统计学意义(t=2.356、2.145,P<0.05)。

结论

手术室心理干预对造口旁疝术患者的情绪及生理特征具有显著的稳定作用。

Objective

To explore the influence of before operation intervention on the patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair.

Methods

From June 2018 to April 2019, 42 patients who underwent parastomal hernia surgery in Guang'an people's Hospital were selected as the objects of observation, including 23 males and 19 females. The average age of the patients was 38.5 years old. According to the random number table, 21 cases in each group were randomly divided into intervention group and control group. Patients in the control group received routine preoperative examination, intraoperative and postoperative care. The patients in the intervention group were given positive psychological guidance before, during and after operation on the basis of routine nursing. The heart rate, blood pressure and other vital signs of the two groups were recorded, and the anxiety index of the patients was measured by Zung self-rating anxiety scale (SAS).

Results

The blood pressure of the intervention group before anesthesia and when the tracheal tube was pulled out was more stable than that of the control group [(116.25±8.79) mmHg vs (129.17±7.65) mmHg, (121.35±15.30) mmHg vs (126.17± 10.85) mmHg], the difference was statistically significant (t=5.24, 8.173, P<0.05). The heart rate of the intervention group before anesthesia and when the catheter was pulled out was stable compared with that of the control group [(71.23±7.26) bpm vs (80.26±7.63) bpm, (77.39±5.63) bpm vs (85.26±11.69) bpm], the difference was statistically significant (t=6.358, 8.241, P<0.05). Before anesthesia and 3 days after operation, the SAS score of the intervention group was lower than that of the control group [(42.63±76.69) scores vs (48.26±6.62) scores, (43.16±6.32) scores vs (46.28±5.32) scores], the difference was statistically significant (t=2.356, 2.145, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The psychological intervention in operating room has a significant stabilizing effect on the emotional and physiological characteristics of the patients.

表1 患者围术期血压的比较(mmHg,±s
表2 患者围手术期心率的比较(次/min,±s
表3 2组患者围手术期Zung焦虑自评量表评分的比较(分,±s
[1]
苏杭. 对造口旁疝患者围术期的护理干预[J]. 当代临床医刊, 2017, 30(4): 3244-3245.
[2]
周思娣. 肠造口病人的护理干预方式及效果观察[J].大家健康(下旬版), 2016, 10(10): 226-226.
[3]
聂洁, 李光焰. 护理干预在肠造口并发症中的应用[C]. 宁夏: 第十八届中国中西医结合学会大肠肛门病专业委员会学术会议暨甘肃省第五届结直肠肛门外科学术年会. 2015.
[4]
庞施莲. 造口治疗师全程护理干预在肠造口患者中的应用价值探讨[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2017, 21(2): 237-238.
[5]
Sabur H, Baykara M, Can B. Laser intervention on trabeculo-Descemet's membrane after resistant viscocanalostomy: Selective 532 nm gonioreconditioning or conventional 1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser goniopuncture?[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2016, 64(8): 568-571.
[6]
郭迎新. 肠造口患者造口并发症的预防及护理的临床分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2017, 15(8): 225.
[7]
陈富强,陈杰,申英末. 造口旁疝的诊疗现状及展望[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5): 69-71.
[8]
段树岐,彭玲玲. 造口旁疝3例[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志, 21(12): 29-29.
[9]
申英末,陈杰,那冬鸣. 造口旁疝的临床诊断与治疗[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2007, 1(2): 776-778.
[10]
Hamilton S, Leahy AL, Darzi A, et al. Biliary intervention via minicholecystostomy[J]. Clin Radiol, 1990, 42(6): 418-422.
[11]
Gerhäuser C, Klimo K, Kahle K, et al. P27 Cancer chemopreventive potential of apple juice Results of a short-term human intervention study with ileostomy patients[J]. Eur J Cancer Supplements, 2008, 6(3): 50-50.
[12]
陈道瑾,代文杰. 造口旁疝的处理[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2006, 10(4): 242-245.
[13]
陈蓟,陈创奇,黄美近. 造口旁疝的诊治分析[J]. 广州医药, 1999, 30(6): 23-25.
[14]
Angott AM, Comerford DA, Ubel PA. Imagining life with an ostomy: Does a video intervention improve quality-of-life predictions for a medical condition that may elicit disgust?[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2013, 91(1): 113-119.
[15]
王卫东,李家潜,林雍熙, 等. 结肠造口旁疝的诊治体会[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2005, 25(8): 1068-1069.
[16]
孙文杰. 造口旁疝的临床诊断与治疗探析[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2013, 21(10): 12-14.
[17]
朱乐乐,王飞通,刘星, 等. 造口旁疝的诊治现状及展望[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 16-19.
[18]
陈俊生,李新明. 结肠造口旁疝原因分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2012, 16(23): 3097.
[19]
张义玲,徐莉杰. 造口旁疝患者围手术期的护理[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2008, 2(2): 56-57.
[20]
Bakkaloglu H, Yanar H, Guloglu R, et al. Ultrasound guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients for surgical intervention[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2006, 12(44): 7179-7182.
[21]
Hedrick JK. Effects of ET nursing intervention on adjustment following ostomy surgery[J]. J Enterostomal Ther, 1987, 14(6): 229-239.
[22]
陈革,唐健雄,黄磊, 等. 肠造口旁疝的手术治疗(附7例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2005, 10(2): 169-170.
[23]
何凯,姚琪远. 从发病机制谈肠造口旁疝的治疗前景[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(2): 118-120.
[24]
黄仁力,邹兆伟,俞金龙. 预防结肠造口术后造口旁疝的研究进展[J]. 腹部外科, 2019, 32(4): 308-312.
[25]
赵凤林,刘亦婷,陈杰. 造口旁疝术后感染24例分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2018, 39(5): 732-735.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[12] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[13] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[14] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[15] 张耕毓, 唐冲, 张昆, 张辉, 张清华, 刘家帮. 股骨头坏死髓芯减压术的文献计量学分析及单中心病例报道[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 771-780.
阅读次数
全文


摘要