切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 444 -447. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.05.015

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术与传统疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的疗效
李从军1,(), 吴永祥2, 李三石1, 谢磊1, 贺从涛1, 尹腾飞1, 代景友1   
  1. 1. 236800 安徽省,亳州市人民医院普外科
    2. 210000 南京,江苏省人民医院急诊室
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-11 出版日期:2019-10-18
  • 通信作者: 李从军
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅社会发展项目(BL2014088)

Efficacy of laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac and traditional high ligation of hernia sac in the treatment of pediatric hernia

Congjun Li1,(), Yongxiang Wu2, Sanshi Li1, Lei Xie1, Congtao He1, Tengfei Yin1, Jingyou Dai1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, BozhouPeople's Hospital, Anhui, Bozhou 236800, China
    2. Emergency Room, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Nanjing 21000, China
  • Received:2019-01-11 Published:2019-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Congjun Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Congjun, Email:
引用本文:

李从军, 吴永祥, 李三石, 谢磊, 贺从涛, 尹腾飞, 代景友. 腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术与传统疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 444-447.

Congjun Li, Yongxiang Wu, Sanshi Li, Lei Xie, Congtao He, Tengfei Yin, Jingyou Dai. Efficacy of laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac and traditional high ligation of hernia sac in the treatment of pediatric hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 444-447.

目的

探究腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术与传统疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的疗效。

方法

选取2016年6月至2018年6月,亳州市人民医院106例腹股沟疝患儿的临床资料,随机分为腹腔镜组(53例)和传统手术组(53例)。传统手术组采用传统疝囊高位结扎术进行,而腹腔镜组采用腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术。比较2组患儿的手术情况、住院情况、并发症、隐匿性疝、对侧疝突出、复发情况。

结果

腹腔镜组的手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后下床活动时间及术后疼痛时间均低于传统手术组,差异有统计学意义(t=8.574、19.072、58.681、14.511、4.981,P均<0.001)。腹腔镜组住院费用(4 152.85±541.59)元高于传统手术组(3 860.71±459.72)元,差异有统计学意义(t=2.994,P=0.003);腹腔镜组住院时间(2.07±1.12)d与传统手术组(2.14±1.49)d比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.273,P=0.785)。腹腔镜组的并发症发生率为7.5%,低于传统手术组30.2%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.874,P=0.003)。术后腹腔镜组对侧疝突出的发生率低于传统手术组,差异有统计学意义(0比9.4%,P=0.003);隐匿性疝发生率显著高于传统手术组,差异有统计学意义(17.0%比0,χ2=5.248,P=0.022);2组间复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(0比3.8%,χ2=2.038,P=0.153)。

结论

腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝,手术效果较好,可有效缓解患儿术后疼痛,减少并发症的发生,帮助患儿迅速康复,降低医疗成本。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac and traditional high ligation of hernia sac in the treatment of pediatric hernia.

Methods

From June 2016 to June 2018, 106 children with pediatric hernia were randomly divided into the laparoscopic group (53 cases) and the traditional group (53 cases). The traditional operation group was performed with high ligation of hernia sac, while the laparoscopic group with laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac. The operation, hospitalization, complications, occult hernia, contralateral hernia protrusion and recurrence were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time, bleeding volume, incision length, the time of getting out of bed and the time of postoperative pain in the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (t=8.574、19.072、58.681、14.511、4.981, all P<0.001). The cost of hospitalization in the laparoscopic group was higher than that of the traditional operation group [(4 152.85± 541.59) yuan vs (3 860.71±459.72) yuan, t=2.994, P=0.003]. There was no significant difference betweenthe laparoscopic group and the traditional surgery group in length of hospitalization [(2.07±1.12) d vs (2.14±1.49) d, t=0.273, P=0.785]. The incidence of complications in laparoscopic group was 7.5%, which was significantly lower than that in traditional operation group (30.2%, χ2=8.874, P=0.003). The incidence of contralateral hernia protrusion in laparoscopic group was lower than that in traditional operation group (0 vs 9.4%, P=0.003), and the incidence of occult herniawere significantly higher than that in traditional operation group (17.0% vs 0, χ2=5.248, P=0.022); There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (χ2=2.038, P=0.153).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac is effective in the treatment of hernia in children. It can effectively relieve the postoperative pain, reduce the occurrence of complications, help the children recover quickly and reduce the medical cost. It is worth popularizing in clinic.

表1 2组患儿手术情况比较(±s
表2 2组患儿术后并发症发生情况比较
表3 2组患儿发现隐匿性疝、术后对侧疝突出、复发情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Şahin AS, Ay N, Şahbaz NA, et al. Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block using different volumes and concentrations of local analgesics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. J Int Med Res, 2017, 45(1): 211-219.
[2]
温秀萍, 叶安, 罗坚炜. 腹腔镜下直针一次穿入治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝70例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(3): 266-268.
[3]
郑向欣, 管小青, 吴骥, 等. 腹腔镜下带线气腹针治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的应用价值[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2015, 22(4): 468-471.
[4]
冯疆勉, 谢伟, 叶正义, 等. 腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗婴幼儿腹股沟疝疗效观察[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(10): 55-56.
[5]
周凯, 杨向东, 付晓君, 等. 小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术与传统疝囊高位结扎术的临床研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2015, 13(5): 719-722.
[6]
朱利民, 黄河, 王艳杰, 等. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎联合脐内侧襞覆盖内环口治疗小儿腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(9): 120-121.
[7]
Yin Y, Zhang H, Zhang X, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of incarcerated indirect inguinal hernia in children[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(6): 3553-3556.
[8]
Gasior AC, Knott EM, Kanters A, et al. Two-center Analysis of Long-term Outcomes after High Ligation Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adolescents[J]. Am Surg, 2015, 81(12): 1260-1262.
[9]
王新星, 李帅, 汤绍涛, 等. 单纯经脐腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2016, 15(4): 348-350.
[10]
万琦文, 石英佐, 张亦鹏. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术与传统开放式疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的疗效及成本比较[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2017, 34(8): 745-747.
[11]
江兵, 李启信, 唐维平. 单孔法腹腔镜在小儿疝囊高位结扎术的应用效果[J]. 安徽医学, 2017, 38(6): 769-771.
[12]
李瑞斌, 李艳茹, 吴攀, 等. 自制穿刺带线针辅助单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1230-1236.
[13]
宣晓琪, 于忠勤, 徐建国, 等. 斜疝患儿行腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术后的复发及危险因素分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(10): 1253-1257.
[14]
孟勇, 汪涛. 腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗婴幼儿腹股沟斜疝疗效观察(附134例报告)[J]. 湖北科技学院学报(医学版), 2016, 30(2): 134-135.
[15]
冯晓川. 双管喉罩对行腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术患儿血流动力学及手术安全的影响[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2016, 10(15): 96-98.
[16]
胡晓立, 刘坚, 尹同治. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的疗效观察[J]. 微创医学, 2016, 11(5): 708-709+731.
[17]
曾文静, 王贤裕, 罗向红, 等. 不同用药方式在腹腔镜小儿疝囊高位结扎术中的麻醉效果比较[J]. 海南医学, 2014, 25(10): 1444-1446.
[18]
Takahashi M, Hotta K, Tamai K, et al. Abdominal Oblique Muscle Hematoma after Ultrasound-guided Transverse Abdominis Plane Block[J]. Masui, 2016, 65(12): 1276-1278.
[19]
胡玲, 王瑞婷, 潘建辉, 等. 一次性双管喉罩在小儿腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎手术中的应用[J]. 广东医学, 2015, 36(15): 2379-2381.
[20]
石元同, 张思德. 腹腔镜与微创小切口手术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床疗效比较[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(2): 105-107.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要