切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 294 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.04.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入修补法治疗获得性腰疝的临床疗效
叶晋生1, 路夷平1,(), 邵欣欣1, 贺志坚1, 张洪海1, 梁燕凯1, 于淼1, 冀祯1, 王洁1, 王啸飞1, 高建新1   
  1. 1. 100010 北京,首都医科大学附属北京中医医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-21 出版日期:2019-08-18
  • 通信作者: 路夷平
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理局临床技术创新项目(XMLX201602)

Clinical effect of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh for the treatment of acquired lumbar hernia

Jinsheng Ye1, Yiping Lu1,(), Xinxin Shao1, Zhijian He1, Honghai Zhang1, Yankai Liang1, Miao Yu1, Zhen Ji1, Jie Wang1, Xiaofei Wang1, Jianxin Gao1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100010, China
  • Received:2019-02-21 Published:2019-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Yiping Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Yiping, Email:
引用本文:

叶晋生, 路夷平, 邵欣欣, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 王洁, 王啸飞, 高建新. 腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入修补法治疗获得性腰疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 294-297.

Jinsheng Ye, Yiping Lu, Xinxin Shao, Zhijian He, Honghai Zhang, Yankai Liang, Miao Yu, Zhen Ji, Jie Wang, Xiaofei Wang, Jianxin Gao. Clinical effect of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh for the treatment of acquired lumbar hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 294-297.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入修补法治疗获得性腰疝的临床疗效,为获得性腰疝的治疗提供相对合理的方案。

方法

2015年1月至2018年6月,首都医科大学附属北京中医医院共对47例获得性腰疝的患者采用腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入修补法进行治疗,记录患者手术前后的临床参数,观察并分析术后并发症及复发情况。

结果

47例患者均经腹腔镜顺利完成手术,手术时间100~180 min,平均134 min;术中出血量80~140 ml,平均110 ml;术后住院时间5~14 d,平均7 d。术后出现浆液肿2例,经穿刺抽液后给予腹带包扎处理后治愈;腹胀4例,均于5 d内自行缓解;肠梗阻1例,于术后第13天治愈;术区疼痛不适10例,给予止痛药治疗后缓解;戳孔感染2例,给予积极换药处理后治愈;患者术后均未出现肠瘘、腹腔感染、戳孔血肿、戳孔疝、慢性疼痛等严重并发症。随访时间6~48个月,均未出现疝复发。

结论

获得性腰疝修补采用腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入修补法进行治疗,目前是一种有效且安全、可行的治疗方法,可促进患者快速康复,降低相关并发症的发生及疝的复发,值得临床进一步推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh for the treatment of acquired lumbar hernia, and to provide a relatively reasonable scheme for the treatment of acquired lumbar hernia.

Methods

47 patients with acquired lumbar hernia were treated by laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh in Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medical University From January 2015 to June 2018. The clinical parameters before and after operation were recorded, and the complications and recurrence were observed and analyzed.

Results

All 47 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery were successfully. The operation time ranged from 100 to 180 minutes, with an average of 134 minutes. Intraoperative bleeding volume ranged from 80 to 140 ml, with an average of 110 ml. Postoperative hospital stay ranged from 5 to 14 days, with an average of 7 days. Two cases occurred seroma after operation, which were cured by abdominal bandage after puncture and drainage; 4 cases of abdominal distension were alleviated within 5 days; 1 case of intestinal obstruction was cured within 13 days after operation; 10 cases of pain and discomfort in operation area were alleviated after painkillers treatment; 2 cases of puncture infection were cured after positive dressing change. No intestinal fistula, abdominal infection, trocar hematoma, trocar hernia and chronic pain occurred after operation. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 48 months. No recurrence of hernia occurred.

Conclusion

Acquired lumbar hernia repair by laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh is an effective, safe and feasible treatment method, which can promote the rapid recovery of patients, reduce the incidence of complications and hernia recurrence. It is worthy of further clinical promotion.

图7 术后留置引流管
[1]
Fahim DK, Kim SD, Cho D, et al. Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 15(5): 532-540.
[2]
Toy FK, Smoot RT, Jr. Toy-Smooth laparoscopic hernioplasty[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(3): 151-155.
[3]
唐健雄. 从现代疝外科原则谈今后发展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(2): 93-97.
[4]
Salvilla SA, Thusu S, Panesar SS. Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2012, 8(4): 111-117.
[5]
Stamatiou D, Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, et al. Lumbar hernia: surgical anatomy, embryology, and technique of repair[J]. Am Surg, 2009, 75(3): 202-207.
[6]
张志斌, 赵欣, 姜伟, 等. 腰疝的临床诊治[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2010, 25(6): 502-503.
[7]
Moreno-Egea A, Baena EG, Calle MC, et al. Controversies in the current management of lumbar hernias[J]. Arch Surg, 2007, 142(1): 82-88.
[8]
宋衡, 宋致成, 杨董超, 等. 腹壁膨出的临床分型与治疗策略选择[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 409-412.
[9]
Oliveira PD, Dos Santos Filho PV, De Menezes Ettinger JE, et al. Abdominal-wall postherpetic pseudohernia[J]. Hernia, 2006, 10(4): 364-366; discussion 293.
[10]
肖乾虎. 腹壁膨出的诊治[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(3): 809-811.
[11]
Kim S, Jeon Y. Treatment of Abdominal Segmental Hernia, Constipation and Pain Following Herpes Zoster with Paravertebral Block[J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(5): E927-929.
[12]
Pineda DM, Rosato EL, Moore JH, Jr. Flank bulge following retroperitoneal incisions: a myofascial flap repair that relieves pain and cosmetic Sequelae[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013, 132(1): 181e-183e.
[13]
Leland HA, Kulber DA. Abdominal Bulge After Retroperitoneal Dissection: The Definitive Management Using Bone Anchored Mesh[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2016, 76(Suppl 3): S200-204.
[14]
柏树令, 应大君, 丁文龙, 等. 系统解剖学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 350-351.
[15]
Fahim DK, Kim SD, Cho D, et al. Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 15(5): 532-540.
[16]
Crouzet S, Chopra S, Tsai S, et al. Flank muscle volume changes after open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(10): 1202-1207.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[13] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[14] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要