切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 76 -78. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.021

所属专题： 文献；

论著

腹腔镜急诊手术与择期手术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床价值
黄韦政1,†(), 邓宏达1, 林慧敏1, 成端辉1   
  1. 1. 530001　广西南宁市第六人民医院外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-25 出版日期:2019-02-18
  • 通信作者: 黄韦政

Clinical value of laparoscopic emergency operation and selective operation in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia

Weizheng Huang1,†(), Hongda Deng1, Huimin Lin1, Duanhui Cheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Guangxi Nanning Sixth People's Hospital, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2018-06-25 Published:2019-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Weizheng Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Weizheng, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

黄韦政, 邓宏达, 林慧敏, 成端辉. 腹腔镜急诊手术与择期手术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 76-78.

Weizheng Huang, Hongda Deng, Huimin Lin, Duanhui Cheng. Clinical value of laparoscopic emergency operation and selective operation in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 76-78.

目的

探讨腹腔镜急诊手术与择期手术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床价值。

方法

选取2014年1月至2017年12月，广西南宁市第六人民医院因腹股沟疝进行救治的患儿198例作为研究对象，根据手术时机不同分为急诊手术组（102例）及择期手术组（96例），对比分析2组手术时间、组织损伤情况、补充诊断、麻醉风险及术后3个月随访并发症发生率。

结果

急诊手术组手术时间较择期手术组时间显著延长，且患儿组织损伤发生率高于择期手术组，腹腔镜探查补充诊断情况低于择期手术组，麻醉风险较择期手术组高，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。急诊手术组患儿鞘膜积液发生率、睾丸萎缩发生率、术后复发率均高于择期手术组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。

结论

在充分考虑患儿病情及是否存在嵌顿及斜疝独立危险因素的前提下，选择择期手术具有较好手术效果。

关键词: 腹腔镜, 小儿腹股沟疝, 急诊手术, 择期手术
Objective

To explore the clinical value of laparoscopic emergency operation and selective operation in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia.

Methods

198 children with inguinal hernia treated in Nanning Sixth Peoples's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were selected as the study subjects. According to the timing of operation, they were divided into the emergency operation group (n=102) and the selective operation group (n=96). The operation time (min), tissue injury, supplementary diagnosis, anesthesia risk and complications incidence were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time of emergency operation group was significantly longer than that of selective operation group (P<0.05). The incidence of tissue injury in the emergency operation group was higher than that in the selective operation group (P<0.05). The supplementary diagnosis of laparoscopic exploration in emergency operation group was lower than that in selective operation group (P<0.05). The risk of anesthesia in the emergency operation group was higher than that in the selective operation group (P<0.05). The incidences of hydrocele, testicular atrophy and recurrence in emergency operation group were higher than those in the selective operation group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Under fully considering the child’s condition and whether there are independent risk factors of incarceration or indirect hernia, the choice of selective surgery has a better surgical effect.

Key words: Laparoscopes, Inguinal hernia in children, Emergency operation, Selective operation
表1 2组手术时间、组织损伤、补充诊断、麻醉风险发生情况比较
组别 例数 手术时间(min,±s) 组织损伤情况[例(%)] 补充诊断[例(%)] 麻醉风险[例(%)]
急诊手术 102 48.56±5.64 46(45.10) 16(15.69) 24(23.53)
择期手术 96 34.52±4.86 10(10.42) 64(66.67) 7(7.29)
检验值 ? 4.352 29.236 53.397 9.874
P值 ? 0.024 0.000 0.000 0.002
表2 急诊手术组与择期手术组术后随访3个月情况比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 鞘膜积液 睾丸萎缩 术后复发
急诊手术 102 7(6.86) 3(2.94) 13(12.75)
择期手术 96 1(1.04) 1(1.04) 4(4.16)
检验值 ? 4.322 0.901 4.637
P值 ? 0.038 0.342 0.031
[1]
Bednarczyk JM, White CW, Ducas RA, et al. Resuscitative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for in hospital cardiac arrest: a Canadian observational experience[J]. Resuscitation, 2014, 85(12): 1713-1719.
[2]
Sulkowski JP, Cooper JN, Duggan EM, et al. Does timing of neonatal inguinal hernia repair affect outcomes?[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2015, 50(1): 171-176.
[3]
刘德鸿, 肖现民, 周以明, 等. 婴幼儿腹股沟嵌顿性斜疝特点与手术年龄的选择[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2003, 2(5): 334-336.
[4]
冯再勇. 腹腔镜治疗小婴儿腹股沟斜疝及其时机的探讨[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2016.
[5]
李正. 实用小儿外科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2001: 11-19.
[6]
胡宗举, 宁长青, 孙雪峰, 等. 改良疝针在腹腔镜下小儿疝高位结扎术的应用体会[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(7): 1156-1158+1270.
[7]
李兵. 小儿腹股沟疝嵌顿的影响因素分析[J]. 海南医学, 2015, 26(6): 878-879.
[8]
Barry DG, Joost V, Kempen BJ, et al. Very low birth weight is an independent risk factor for emergency surgery in premature infants with inguinal hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(3): 347-352.
[9]
刘湘, 潘祖安. 小儿腹股沟斜疝发病危险因素的病例对照研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2004, 19(7): 10-12.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号