腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术207例临床研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.012

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 44 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.012

所属专题：经典病例；文献；

论著

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术207例临床研究

佴永军¹^,^†(

), 蔡永东¹, 曹红勇¹

^1. 210006　南京医科大学附属南京医院（南京市第一医院）普外科

收稿日期:2018-03-02 出版日期:2019-02-18
通信作者: 佴永军

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair: A clinical study of 207 cases

Yongjun Nai¹^,^†(), Yongdong Cai¹, Hongyong Cao¹

^1. Department of General Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China

Received:2018-03-02 Published:2019-02-18
Corresponding author: Yongjun Nai
About author:
Corresponding author: Nai Yongjun, Email: doctornyj@hotmail.com

全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用

目的

探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal，TEP）的安全性及临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年7月，南京医科大学附属南京医院行TEP并应用3D补片及免固定方法的腹股沟疝207例患者的临床资料。

结果

179例单侧疝及28例双侧疝患者均成功施行TEP手术，单侧手术时间30～100 min，平均（51.8±10.7）min，双侧疝手术时间55～130 min，平均（92.2±18.8）min；术中出血量5～20 ml，平均术后住院（2.1±0.5）d；术后并发症：尿潴留4例（1.9%）、阴囊气肿2例（1%）、血清肿10例（4.8%）、暂时性神经感觉异常1例（0.5%）。术后随访16～60个月，复发1例（0.5%）。

结论

TEP应用3D补片及免固定技术是一种安全、有效的腹股沟疝修补方式。

关键词: 疝，腹股沟, 疝修补术, 腹腔镜

Objective

To investigate the safety and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) of hernia.

Methods

The data of 207 patients received TEP with 3D mesh and no-fixation method were analyzed retrospectively from January 2012 to July 2016.

Results

179 patients with unilateral hernia and 28 patients with bilateral hernias received the TEP successfully. The operative time of unilateral or bilateral hernia repair were 30 to 100 minutes [mean (51.8±10.7) minutes] and 55 to 130 minutes [mean (92.2±18.8) minutes], respectively. The blood loss during operation was 5 to 20 ml, and the average postoperative hospital stay was (2.1±0.5) days. The postoperative complications included 4 urinary retention (1.9%), 2 pneumoscrotum (1%), 10 seroma (4.8%), and 1 transient neuropraxia (0.5%). Following up for 16 to 60 months, there was 1 recurrent case (0.5%).

Conclusion

TEP with 3D mesh and no-fixation method is a safe and efficient inguinal hernia repair method.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Herniorrhaphy, Laparoscopes

[1]	Reiner MA, Bresnahan ER. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair outcomes[J]. JSLS, 2016, 20(3): e2016. 00043.
[2]	Pahwa HS, Kumar A, Agarwal P, et al. Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2015, 3(9): 789-792.
[3]	Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level l studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 15l-163.
[4]	Zhu X, Cao H, Ma Y, et al. Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty versus open extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of outcomes of our current knowledge[J]. Surgeon, 2014, 12(2): 94-105.
[5]	Mihăileanu F, Chiorescu S, Grad O, et al. The Surgical Treatment of Inguinal Hernia Using the Laparoscopic Totally Extra-Peritoneal (TEP) Technique[J]. Clujul Med, 2015, 88(1): 58-64.
[6]	Hanif H, Memon SA. Outcome of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernioplasty for inguinal hernia[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2015, 27(3): 613-616.
[7]	Patel LY, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, et al. Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(5): 2109-2121.
[8]	Group H. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[9]	Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, et al. A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker fixation versus no-fixation of mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Int J Surg, 2012, 10(5): 224-231.
[10]	Kumar A, Kaistha S, Gangavatiker R. Non-fixation Versus Fixation of Mesh in Totally Extraperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia: a Comparative Study[J]. Indian J Surg, 2018, 80(2): 128-133.
[11]	Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic(TAPP) and endoscopic(TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia(International Endohernia Society)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(2): 289-321.
[12]	乐飞, 李健文, 王文瑞, 等. 单中心腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术4445例[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(9): 724-727.
[13]	Aikoye A, Harilingam M, Khushal A. The Impact of High Surgical Volume on Outcomes From Laparoscopic(Totally Extra Peritoneal) Inguinal Hernia Repair[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(6): PC15-16.

[1]	李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2]	李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3]	李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4]	陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5]	许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6]	李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7]	任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8]	赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9]	李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10]	韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11]	王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12]	冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13]	王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14]	杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15]	叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair: A clinical study of 207 cases

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair: A clinical study of 207 cases