切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 422 -424. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.06.006

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

腹股沟疝患者术后下肢深静脉血栓的风险评估及对策
刘家鑫1, 周洁1, 徐群1, 郭自成1, 杨福全1,()   
  1. 1. 110004 沈阳,中国医科大学附属盛京医院第十一普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-24 出版日期:2018-12-18
  • 通信作者: 杨福全

Risk assessment and countermeasures of deep venous thrombosis of patients after inguinal hernia surgery

Jiaxin Liu1, Jie Zhou1, Qun Xu1, Zicheng Guo1, Fuquan Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
  • Received:2018-07-24 Published:2018-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Fuquan Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Fuquan, Email:
引用本文:

刘家鑫, 周洁, 徐群, 郭自成, 杨福全. 腹股沟疝患者术后下肢深静脉血栓的风险评估及对策[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 422-424.

Jiaxin Liu, Jie Zhou, Qun Xu, Zicheng Guo, Fuquan Yang. Risk assessment and countermeasures of deep venous thrombosis of patients after inguinal hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 422-424.

目的

评估腹股沟疝患者术后形成深静脉血栓(deep vein thrombosis,DVT)的风险,针对不同风险级别给予相应对策。

方法

回顾性分析2015年3月至2018年1月,中国医科大学附属盛京医院收治的腹股沟疝行手术治疗556例患者的相关临床资料,经Caprini血栓风险评估量表评估风险等级分为4个级别:低危、中危、高危、极高危,每一级别再根据术后是否进行抗凝治疗分为抗凝组和未抗凝组,统计患者术后形成DVT人数,应用χ2检验对相关结果进行统计学分析。

结果

低、中危级别患者共72例,术后未见DVT形成。极高危级别患者369例,抗凝组术后DVT形成者有7例,未抗凝组DVT形成者为15例,差异有统计学意义(χ2=20.379,P<0.05);高危级别患者113例,抗凝组术后形成DVT者3例,未抗凝组术后DVT形成者7例,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.744,P<0.05)。中危级别2组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹股沟疝术后的根据风险分级合理预防治疗,可减少术后发生DVT风险。

Objective

To assess the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after inguinal hernia surgery, and to provide corresponding countermeasures for different risk levels.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for inguinal hernia in Shengjing Hospital from March 2015 to January 2018. The risk scores were assessed by the Caprini Thrombosis Risk Assessment Scale into four groups: low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and extremely high-risk. Each group was divided into anticoagulation group and non-anticoagulant group according to whether anticoagulation treatment was performed after operation. The number of DVT patients after inguinal hernia was counted, and the results were statistically analyzed by chi-square test.

Results

A total of 72 patients with low-and intermediate-risk grades did not develop DVT after operation; 369 patients were in the extremely high-risk class, 7 patients developed DVT in the anticoagulation group, and 15 patients in the non-anticoagulation group, the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=20.379, P<0.05); 113 patients with high-risk grade, 3 patients with DVT in anticoagulation group, and 7 patients with DVT in non-anticoagulation group, The above differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.744, P<0.05). Patients with intermediate-risk level, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).

Conclusion

Reasonable prevention and treatment according to risk classification after inguinal hernia can reduce the risk of postoperative DVT.

表1 不同Caprin评分级别抗凝组与未抗凝组比较
[1]
Hammad FT,Kennedy-Smith A,Robinson RG. Erosions and urinary retention following polypropylene synthetic sling: Australasian survey[J]. Eur Urol, 2005, 47(5): 641-646.
[2]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组. 成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(7): 484-486.
[3]
Bahl V,Hu HM,Henke PK, et al. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method[J]. Ann Surg, 2010, 251(2): 344-350.
[4]
Pannucci CJ,Barta RJ,Portschy PR, et al. Assessment of postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in plastic surgery patients using the 2005 and 2010 Caprini Risk score[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 130(2): 343-353.
[5]
Pannucci CJ,Bailey SH,Dreszer G, et al. Validation of the caprini risk assessment model in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2011, 212(1): 105-112.
[6]
Zhou H,Wang L,Wu X, et al. Validation of a venous thromboembolism risk assessment model in hospitalized chinese patients: a case-control study[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2014, 21(3): 261-272.
[7]
Cushman M. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis [J]. Semin Hematol, 2007, 44(2): 62-69.
[8]
马秀侠. 下肢深静脉血栓的形成原因分析与预防[J]. 医学信息, 2010, 23(12): 106.
[9]
李友伟. 二氧化碳气腹对下肢静脉血流动力学的影响[J]. 西部医学, 2011, 23(10): 1865-1866.
[10]
李成恩. 预防患者术后深静脉血栓形成[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2014, (22): 2647-2648.
[11]
杨东生,刘克忠. 围手术期干预对预防腹股沟疝术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的影响[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(4): 19-21.
[12]
中华医学会心血管病分会肺血管病学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会. 急性肺血栓栓塞症诊断治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2010, 49(1): 74-81.
[13]
施惠芳,周佳. Caprini评估表在卒中老年患者深静脉血栓预防护理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(4): 59-61.
[14]
静脉血栓栓塞症抗凝治疗微循环血栓防治共识专家组. 静脉血栓栓塞症抗凝治疗微循环血栓防治专家共识[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2017, 16(4): 241-244.
[15]
Brunelli A. Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism: prophylaxis, diagnosis, and management[J]. Thoracic Surgery Clinics, 2012, 22(1): 25-28.
[16]
中华医学会外科学分会血管外科学组. 深静脉血栓形成的诊断和治疗指南(第三版)[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2017, 32(9): 807-812.
[17]
Humes DJ,Abdulsultan A,Walker AJ, et al. Duration and magnitude of postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism after planned inguinal hernia repair in men: a population-based cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2018, (4): 1-7.
[1] 蒙燕, 唐如冰, 蒋奕, 陆华, 苏玉兰, 张琼, 何英煜. 基于多学科协作的预防性淋巴管-静脉吻合术在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 204-207.
[2] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[3] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[4] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[5] 朱俊佳, 孙琦, 徐文龙, 陆天宇, 冯强, 储涛, 邢春根, 高春冬, 俞一峰, 赵振国. 永久性结肠造口预防性补片置入对预防造口旁疝价值的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 336-342.
[6] 赵信燕, 岳晓霞, 曹瑞玲, 张惠丽, 李向杰. 急性肺栓塞影像学及临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 296-299.
[7] 杨凤霞, 张英, 尤楠, 王霞, 黄小兵, 冯欢. 原位肝移植术后肺部并发症的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 329-331.
[8] 李干斌, 侯睿, 郭雅萍, 张潇, 邱小原, 牛备战, 林国乐. 改良经辅助切口回肠造口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 271-276.
[9] 张宇, 余灵祥, 赵亮, 张宁, 赵德希, 刁广浩, 杨木易, 刘佳, 李鹏, 任辉. 利伐沙班在脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后门静脉血栓预防中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 195-199.
[10] 周璐, 温镕博, 刘子璇, 李奕飏, 周乐其, 朱晓明, 龚海峰, 高显华, 楼征, 刘连杰, 郝立强, 于冠宇, 张卫. Changhai-AL-Prediction预测模型指导预防性造口合理实施的卫生经济学研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 280-287.
[11] 李佳曦, 刘子源, 李学民. 二甲双胍对年龄相关性白内障影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 252-256.
[12] 陈芳, 王建英, 曹建用, 刘丽, 罗晓琴. 基于分析-设计-开发-实施-评价模式的叙事护理培训在产科预防性介入治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 392-396.
[13] 鲍小倩, 王盈盈, 王俊雅, 王晨. 十二指肠镜预防性维护对策在降低故障维修中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 132-134.
[14] 李兰兰, 龚忆华, 陈泳欣, 郑纯翠, 易石坚. 失效模式和效果分析模式提高医院保洁人员标准预防依从性的效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 277-280.
[15] 翟鸿瑞, 周世健, 郑云龙, 牟笛, 刘小波, 鲁亮, 李建东, 黄晓霞, 陈秋兰, 张彦平. 我国登革热输入引发本地传播风险评估与对策分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 165-172.
阅读次数
全文


摘要